with 1 swoop

[utah saints]

One way to kill a forum is culling posters you don't like, I don't know if dmb is behind any bans or even what type of ban they are if it stops them posting next door but I don't agree with it.

Banning Tyler for what he posted seven years ago I can understand, this time around I haven't seen anything to get upset about, as for Rav & mahatma, yeah Rav has spammed the board but so what, just ignore the spam, in mahatma's case I love his posts, none of em make any sense but no way in the world are they ban worthy.

Just let people be, don't like em don't read em, save the bans for the serious stuff.

This place was just about finished before Rav came over messing about, at least it put some life back into it.

whoever banned ravpig tyler filth and mahatma must have done a good job because they can't even post on pigsmad now.

[aussieowl]

Mahatma isn't banned. Rav was spamming and being abusive, Tyler is serving a temporary ban, hope that clear's things up

...mahatma likes to say he is though, I think he loves it really.

dmb, you mod how you want pal, you're the guy with the gig...it's only my opinion that too many bans are dished out for not much at all, unless it's completely over the top as Tyler was seven years ago my thoughts on it are just ignore the stuff you don't like, Rav is a pest but you can't deny it put some life back into this forum.

Bladesmad is in ignore mode at the minute but, why bother actually putting someone on ignore when it's easier to just, well, ignore them.... their poster Paddys has been ignored by me for about two years now, haven't read a single post of his in all that time but I couldn't be ar5ed to actually go into profiles and click on whatever you have to click to put him on a list.

Also, this is a football forum, not Women's Institute, although some might think so.., so I'd expect a certain level of abuse, after being mauled by thaiowl for several years I've had more than my fair share but sometimes I wish he'd come back, at least it would be interesting.

[banno]

got to agree aussie, ban only when its abusive and necessary.
ravpork was close to the line as he was warned and was trying to get banned (he said so himself on here). you have to say if he is going to f@(k about with admin, he's brought it on himself and deserves it.
i went on porkmad and spammed a bit in the hope of him seeing it and hopefully reeling it in a bit, but it didn't work and i get a warning (taken on chin and deserved so you toe the line or get banned).
tyler is a different case, he's a d1ck and i couldn't care less what happens to him.

[banno]

...mahatma likes to say he is though, I think he loves it really.

dmb, you mod how you want pal, you're the guy with the gig...it's only my opinion that too many bans are dished out for not much at all, unless it's completely over the top as Tyler was seven years ago my thoughts on it are just ignore the stuff you don't like, Rav is a pest but you can't deny it put some life back into this forum.

Bladesmad is in ignore mode at the minute but, why bother actually putting someone on ignore when it's easier to just, well, ignore them.... their poster Paddys has been ignored by me for about two years now, haven't read a single post of his in all that time but I couldn't be ar5ed to actually go into profiles and click on whatever you have to click to put him on a list.

Also, this is a football forum, not Women's Institute, although some might think so.., so I'd expect a certain level of abuse, after being mauled by thaiowl for several years I've had more than my fair share but sometimes I wish he'd come back, at least it would be interesting.

you have a point but i think its probably too late for ravpork.

[utah saints]

tyler is utter filth banno and you should see what he posts s2 forum.but the mods suck it up and laugh with him

BANNED AND SHOULD STAY BANNED

[utah saints]

you have a point but i think its probably too late for ravpork.

bit of bad luck he's having but fcuk him.