+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: o/t Is this the greatest ever bet

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    15,137

    o/t Is this the greatest ever bet

    5/03/2017 18:58:31 BST 0000502 Double (Win) 1 £ 20.00 Stevenage 3-0 Portsmouth Half-time/Full-time Stevenage/Stevenage 11/2 £ 1,170.00
    15/03/2017 18:58:31 BST
    0000502
    Double (Win)
    1
    £ 20.00
    Sheffield Wednesday 0-2 Reading Half-time/Full-time Reading/Reading 8/1
    £ 1,170.00
    13/03/2017 16:25:05 BST 0000501 Single (Win) 1 £ 40.00 16:30 Race winner The Caller 9/4

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    15,137
    Not the caller one!

    To clarify the Ladbrokes bet it was HT/FT double Reading and Stevenage £20 bet paid £1170!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    3,331
    Great bet Kempo.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,214
    Nice 1.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,750
    People bet on Leicester title at 5000/1.

    Yours works out around 58/1, not that great.

    If you did one such bet a week you'd expect to get a win like that near enough every year.

    People placing a 5000/1 bet every week could expect a win once every 96 years for perspective.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    11,992
    Not really a fair comparison.

    The Leicester odds attract those punters willing to risk a small amount ie £1 to £5 and on a one off event.

    The kempo example needs higher stakes to get higher returns and is in fact a sequence of winning events not just a "one off"

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    4,750
    Quote Originally Posted by jolly_roger View Post
    The Leicester odds attract those punters willing to risk a small amount ie £1 to £5 and on a one off event.

    The kempo example needs higher stakes to get higher returns and is in fact a sequence of winning events not just a "one off"
    People bet a lot more than £5 on Leicester title.

    In mathematical statistics the number of events is not as significant as you seem to give weight. If bookes are giving 60/1 on an accumulator it means that there was a certain reasonable chance of each event having a favourable outcome. If you lump together some highly unlikely events the odds multiply to extreme improbability, but kempo's combination was not anywhere near so inconceivably unlikely.

    Kempo might have been making equlivent bets for a decade with only 1 win, in which case his performance would be very poor. Good results in isolation tell us nothing.
    Last edited by John2; 20-03-2017 at 01:21 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    18,189

    Kempo might have been making equivalent bets for a decade with only 1 win.
    We know he has

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    4,969
    Whose bet is it if it's true. What's point of putting bets up when they've run.

    Me what I do if I can get hold of some bookies money I reinvest it. Had £800 on Denman when he won the Gold cup. That was all profit made during the week. Won me £2,600 on the week.

    When Long run won the Gold cup had £500 on it out of profit made.

    But that's only 2 times it's worked. Made a profit & lost it a few times. Only do that Cheltenham Festival week.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    15,137
    Quote Originally Posted by John2 View Post
    People bet on Leicester title at 5000/1.

    Yours works out around 58/1, not that great.

    If you did one such bet a week you'd expect to get a win like that near enough every year.

    People placing a 5000/1 bet every week could expect a win once every 96 years for perspective.
    LOL...Trust you to put a downer on it!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •