Originally Posted by
lbj
Posters keep referring to "teams".......for example:
"How many teams in league one would have done as badly as we have in the championship this season?
"A team" from league one would have done better !
"Team" is the operative word in our case....we were being drilled as a "team" during the early days of the season and we were affective as an attacking force but far too many individual errors caused the goals against tally to rise.
Since ( and even including ) the KJ debacle - we have never managed to attain the level of a "team".
Ridding ourselves of those individuals who were making those mistakes ( which we didn't ) would have made the goals we scored affective and getting points on the board.
PW has had more than half a season to "affect" - players and the team.....and that's what head coaches are paid for............
"To affect the individual players and the collective team performance"
Well Warne hasn't.....We'll NOT in a positive way - in fact performances are getting worse....but confidence and moral must be having an impact !
Leicester are a prime example of when the board got it right !
I'm afraid we are more related to the Birmingham model....
GR & AS were doing ok and should have left to finish the season !
Tactics have also been wrong under Warne - playing expansive football doesn't work in the championship due being out gunned - but building a defensive wall - having kept the worst perpetrators hasn't worked either because we kept the problem players...and what's worse - we might be keeping them again.....Sadly...