ex BBC presenter found guilty of abusing 6 boys

[ed_Scottishfitba1]

I am not wanting to make light of this situation in any way but the perpretators of the offence are 60 and 69 now; the offences took place between 1992 and 1996 when the guilty parties were 45/49 and 54/58. Still guilty due to age of victims.

[ontherise]

calm doon ya fud......

these incidents happened in 1994.........he lost his golf ball in the woods she was in the woods........she offered her honour he honoured her offer and for the next 2 hours it was honour and offer

you should take up golf, you might get yer hole you mega offended finger wagging di...ck !!

you might not have lost yer cherry till u were in yer 40's ya fat hvvn......but I lost mine to a 19 yr old when I was 15....trust me,, I wasnt forced into anything, should I phone the police cause tecnically I was " underage " ?

They groomed the kids before abusing them, that's what pedophiles and perverts do, they normalise the abuse, just like what we are reading from the celtic supporters on here, normal behaviour.

"But the court heard how the couple had befriended their young victims and, once they had their trust, proceeded to ***ually abuse them."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...th-GUILTY.html

Your 13 year son comes home one night and says he was approached by some old burd asking to feel his cock, she said her man would stand ****ing himself whilst she did so, and your response is "why are you here telling me this, you should have let her do whatever she wanted and if he wanted to join in then all the better".

A 13 year old is a child, is most definitely off the radar when it comes to any ***ual practices and is of course illegal, regardless if you think having *** with a child is a "technicality" due to the age of that child.

You consider ***ual acts with male children to be acceptable, in fact you seem to think this is normal behaviour, it is no wonder there are five beasts awaiting trial for the same offences at your club.

The celtic supporters would simply laugh and allow these depraved perverts to move on to their next victims as they have in the past, but thankfully the courts seen this for what is obviously was and handed down the appropriate sentence, five years for abusing several children.

[ontherise]

I am not wanting to make light of this situation in any way but the perpretators of the offence are 60 and 69 now; the offences took place between 1992 and 1996 when the guilty parties were 45/49 and 54/58. Still guilty due to age of victims.

Yes and the victims were around 13 years old, but will be 30ish now, what is the point you are making?

The bit I have put on bold, would you care to expand on that to.

[ed_Scottishfitba1]

The offences took place when the victims were under age. Doesn't matter when the guilty parties were caught. I was mearly pointing out the ages of the offenders at the time of the offence. Does not make them any less guilty.

[ontherise]

The offences took place when the victims were under age. Doesn't matter when the guilty parties were caught. I was mearly pointing out the ages of the offenders at the time of the offence. Does not make them any less guilty.

Thank you for pointing out the blatantly obvious.

[ed_Scottishfitba1]

There were some who were suggesting that offences were carried out by a 60 year old at the time of the offence. Not always obvious to all

[ontherise]

There were some who were suggesting that offences were carried out by a 60 year old at the time of the offence. Not always obvious to all

I was referring to the age of the children who were abused, you said they were "Still guilty due to age of victims".

Bit like saying "the thief was guilty due to stealing the money".

Anyway, why do celtic supporters think the abuse of children is OK or funny or perfectly normal when the offences are serious enough to warrant five years in prison?

[ed_Scottishfitba1]

I don't think I ever suggested the victims were guilty in any way. I never even mentioned the vicitims in my post.

[52N4E]

P@edo this, p@edo that, wonder where we've heard that before concerning Celtic supporters ?

This kind of comment is rampant amongst the thick hun support, who seem to think that p@edophilia is some kind of stick to beat other fans with.

On the rise, aka Rolf is back. Just couldn't stay away

[boowho]

I was referring to the age of the children who were abused, you said they were "Still guilty due to age of victims".

Bit like saying "the thief was guilty due to stealing the money".

Anyway, why do celtic supporters think the abuse of children is OK or funny or perfectly normal when the offences are serious enough to warrant five years in prison?

why is who I support relevant in anyway to anything I have said?? You sound like a typicial hvvvn ******* obcessed with child abuse to use as a stick but one who really dosnt give a flying fuvvk about the victims,, nice to sing about tho

do me a favour, try and talk about child abuse without mentioning Celtic............but you couldnt,,could u ??

all the more reason the world rejoiced when yer rancid club died like a pish stained beggar in the gutter