+ Visit Scotland Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The Lying King

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    9,620

    The Lying King

    2012 :

    "And I follow the logic of the argument that if we lose the tax case then we probably gained some competitive advantage"

    2017:

    "...whether it survived tax scrutiny or not, made no difference to the playing squad of the club during that period and hence had no impact...."

    His opinions, like his eyes, go in different directions.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    337
    Quote Originally Posted by seumasbhoy View Post
    2012 :

    "And I follow the logic of the argument that if we lose the tax case then we probably gained some competitive advantage"

    2017:

    "...whether it survived tax scrutiny or not, made no difference to the playing squad of the club during that period and hence had no impact...."

    His opinions, like his eyes, go in different directions.
    A convicted tax fraud over seeking another illegal tax fraud..what do you expect from a glib and shameless liar

    strip the titles !!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    7,114
    it was the same with the bankruptcy thing. Remember all the say no to liquidation the peepil came out with and how it was ***** to come out of administration. No CVA, suddenly we were treated to a new narrative. Well actually it isnt Rangers. Its the company that own Rangers stupid. I dont remember one article or argument before Rangers failed to secure their CVA about this separate entity of club and company. Doesnt matter what happens they will always make up some narrative and will convince themselves in their own echo chamber that it is fact.
    Last edited by mogwaiCSC; 08-07-2017 at 07:53 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    13,166
    Murray agreed on the stand that Rangers gained an advantage so phukk knows why glib and shameless is claiming they never

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    579
    Quote Originally Posted by mogwaiCSC View Post
    it was the same with the bankruptcy thing. Remember all the say no to liquidation the peepil came out with and how it was ***** to come out of administration. No CVA, suddenly we were treated to a new narrative. Well actually it isnt Rangers. Its the company that own Rangers stupid. I dont remember one article or argument before Rangers failed to secure their CVA about this separate entity of club and company. Doesnt matter what happens they will always make up some narrative and will convince themselves in their own echo chamber that it is fact.
    they also convince themselves its everybody elses fault and everybody is oot to get them

    fuds

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •