+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 65 of 65

Thread: George Thorne

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,651
    Spot on Swales I couldn't have put it better myself you have to tread very carefully as an employer Fortunately I've not been in that position myself but I know business colleagues have who have rushed into dismissals and it has cost them dearly

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,716
    Quote Originally Posted by swaledale View Post
    Your right it should have been retirement due to ill health, as for redundancy being used only when your role is no longer required, not true actually, in a restructure everybody can be put on notice of redundancy and then a process is gone thorough to appoint people to the roles in the new structure, with the unlucky ones being made redundant, even though their actual role hasn't gone - but has changed in some way.

    I have to laugh when yet another poster makes an assumption that I'm giving an opinion, when actually its based on actual knowledge and experience whereas you don't seem to have read the link you posted in detail.

    Dismissal on the grounds of ill health has to be handled very carefully, as indeed the link you posted says and as for it being normal, well yes it has to be handled commonly but rarely can you simply dismiss someone who cannot work due to illness there is a process to go through which includes an assessment as to whether or not they can do their job again and in what time frame etc. , whether they are classed as disabled etc. etc. Much as I said previously will depend upon the terms and conditions of the employment contract and indeed many employers do dismiss illegally and I've attended many a an employment tribunal where that has cost the employer dearly.

    In any case the employment status of a footballer and someone in normal work is not comparable and the contracts are very different and it is rare for a club to simply ditch a player due to his injury record, unless the players contract comes to an end.

    However, I'm understand that many on here are happy with broad generalisations and couldn't give a flying **** about reality ho hum!
    Close, fair effort though.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    7,189
    Quote Originally Posted by AdiSalisbury View Post
    Close, fair effort though.
    I might have guessed Swale wouldn't leave it.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,069
    Where would be the fun in that?

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    20,069
    And to think this all started because FFS! said we should simply ditch Thorne for being injured!

    Anyway it seems he should be fit for the first game, prob come on as a sub after Huddlestone does his ACL and is out for the rest of the season.

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •