shopify analytics

Bet for FREE on football and win real cash bet4F is changing the game
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 43

Thread: Chadli to move on?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Gloucester
    Posts
    19,225

    Chadli to move on?

    I know papers run stories with the slightest bit of reality but this could well be going to happen. I know Chadli was out of order not going to boot camp and is wasted under Pulis but I'd still rather he stayed.
    How come Pulis played flair players in an attractive Palace side? Maybe they weren't but I did get that impression.

    http://readwestbrom.com/2017/07/11/s...-nacer-chadli/

  2. #2
    He's got to go you can't have a player dictating to the manager about training methods it causes friction with the other players that's something you don't need

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by holmleighchris View Post
    I know papers run stories with the slightest bit of reality but this could well be going to happen. I know Chadli was out of order not going to boot camp and is wasted under Pulis but I'd still rather he stayed.
    How come Pulis played flair players in an attractive Palace side? Maybe they weren't but I did get that impression.

    http://readwestbrom.com/2017/07/11/s...-nacer-chadli/

    What a load of bollox! So it's the fault of Pulis he's a lazy c unt? Whilst, McClean does not have the talent that Chadli has, he at least runs his balls off every game.

    Chadli is a prima dona and most Spurs supporters said so - bit like another Sess in that he's outstanding one game out of every four or even six!

    Would you blame Pulis Chris, if the line markings on the pitch were not razor sharp! Bit of a contradiction too, as most West Brom supporters wanted Brunt out before Pulis came, and he had one of his best seasons last year in many - should you blame Pulis for this? How about blaming Pulis for Livermore breaking back into the England squad too! What about blaming Pulis for not taking out his own cheque book to pay Fletcher what Stoke did, even though it was typical West Brom - slowness and greed!

    Incredible
    Last edited by baggieal; 11-07-2017 at 06:32 PM.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by baggieal View Post
    What a load of bollox! So it's the fault of Pulis he's a lazy c unt? Whilst, McClean does not have the talent that Chadli has, he at least runs his balls off every game.

    Chadli is a prima dona and most Spurs supporters said so - bit like another Sess in that he's outstanding one game out of every four or even six!

    Would you blame Pulis Chris, if the line markings on the pitch were not razor sharp! Bit of a contradiction too, as most West Brom supporters wanted Brunt out before Pulis came, and he had one of his best seasons last year in many - should you blame Pulis for this? How about blaming Pulis for Livermore breaking back into the England squad too! What about blaming Pulis for not taking out his own cheque book to pay Fletcher what Stoke did, even though it was typical West Brom - slowness and greed!

    Incredible
    Way I see it Chadli was outstanding when he came in the number 10 role. He then picked up the injury. When he eventually got back in the team our tactical genious of a manager shoved him on the left wing. Effectively playing him as a second full back. Thus nullifying the threat he posed oppositions. I don't condone what Chadli has done but play him in his most effective position and then criticize him if he doesn't deliver.
    If your talking about players having one good game in six then Morrison has made a career out of it or take James McLean who has no good games in six but he runs a lot so that's ok.
    Has it ever occurred that Fletcher may have gone because he was sick of Pulis's training methods? Or he couldn't face running up hills in Austria?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Whicka_Mon View Post
    Way I see it Chadli was outstanding when he came in the number 10 role. He then picked up the injury. When he eventually got back in the team our tactical genious of a manager shoved him on the left wing. Effectively playing him as a second full back. Thus nullifying the threat he posed oppositions. I don't condone what Chadli has done but play him in his most effective position and then criticize him if he doesn't deliver.
    If your talking about players having one good game in six then Morrison has made a career out of it or take James McLean who has no good games in six but he runs a lot so that's ok.
    Has it ever occurred that Fletcher may have gone because he was sick of Pulis's training methods? Or he couldn't face running up hills in Austria?
    Or more likely he went for more money and a longer contract, also why would he dislike the training methods after all they kept him fit and he played 80 odd consecrative games for us, i agree Chadli was wasted on his return from injury but i also saw a player that was bottling out of 50/50 tackles and missing good chances to score against Liverpool and Chelsea.

  6. #6
    To'the'Sea'in'Ships'

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Whicka_Mon View Post
    Way I see it Chadli was outstanding when he came in the number 10 role. He then picked up the injury. When he eventually got back in the team our tactical genious of a manager shoved him on the left wing. Effectively playing him as a second full back. Thus nullifying the threat he posed oppositions. I don't condone what Chadli has done but play him in his most effective position and then criticize him if he doesn't deliver.
    If your talking about players having one good game in six then Morrison has made a career out of it or take James McLean who has no good games in six but he runs a lot so that's ok.
    Has it ever occurred that Fletcher may have gone because he was sick of Pulis's training methods? Or he couldn't face running up hills in Austria?

    Fletcher went to Stake for more money which West Brom did not want to pay - absolute fact! I would rather have a McClean who lacks talent but gives blood as opposed to a lazy c unt. Even the Spurs fans all said he had one good game in every four - look at their comments!!!! A player should break sweat wherever he's told to play - Valencia was one of the best players for Man Utd but for sure, he would rather play in what he considers to be his natural position.

    Is it Pulis' fault as well that my eight year old could score more of the sitters that came to Rondon! Oh, I forgot, he holds the ball up well!

    On 60K a week, most normal people would run up the hills backwards, then forwards, then sidewards. It's a big effort for Chadli to even sign a few autographs outside the ground!

    As usual, we will spend peanuts. If, I was the little man in China, I would love people like you over my Chicken Chow Mein - it means the manager gets absolute hell, whilst I rake in the profits and continue the Jeremy model - spend feckall!

    What a great model - rake in the profits - spend feckall, and the doughnuts who spend the money blame a paid employee

  8. #8
    Hope he goes,thinks he's better than he is.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by baggieal View Post
    Fletcher went to Stake for more money which West Brom did not want to pay - absolute fact! I would rather have a McClean who lacks talent but gives blood as opposed to a lazy c unt. Even the Spurs fans all said he had one good game in every four - look at their comments!!!! A player should break sweat wherever he's told to play - Valencia was one of the best players for Man Utd but for sure, he would rather play in what he considers to be his natural position.

    Is it Pulis' fault as well that my eight year old could score more of the sitters that came to Rondon! Oh, I forgot, he holds the ball up well!

    On 60K a week, most normal people would run up the hills backwards, then forwards, then sidewards. It's a big effort for Chadli to even sign a few autographs outside the ground!

    As usual, we will spend peanuts. If, I was the little man in China, I would love people like you over my Chicken Chow Mein - it means the manager gets absolute hell, whilst I rake in the profits and continue the Jeremy model - spend feckall!

    What a great model - rake in the profits - spend feckall, and the doughnuts who spend the money blame a paid employee
    I was just giving another opinion on Fletcher. You state facts but unless you can prove it it is not a fact. Didn't Pulis drop him for Field the publicly slag him off saying "his standards had dropped"? Yep i'd play for him. Bit like your "fact" that Chester was a done deal before Pulis arrived. Even though he signed seven months later.
    This other bloke who you've not got a good word to say about has just payed 180m or so for an average Premier League football team. You think for some bizarre reason should throw another 100m or so at it just because we want him to and 40m is not enough. So 300m in a year ? Would you?
    Pulis can't keep supporters of his own team in the stands for 90 minutes because watching his team play is like pulling teeth.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Whicka_Mon View Post
    I was just giving another opinion on Fletcher. You state facts but unless you can prove it it is not a fact. Didn't Pulis drop him for Field the publicly slag him off saying "his standards had dropped"? Yep i'd play for him. Bit like your "fact" that Chester was a done deal before Pulis arrived. Even though he signed seven months later.
    This other bloke who you've not got a good word to say about has just payed 180m or so for an average Premier League football team. You think for some bizarre reason should throw another 100m or so at it just because we want him to and 40m is not enough. So 300m in a year ? Would you?
    Pulis can't keep supporters of his own team in the stands for 90 minutes because watching his team play is like pulling teeth.

    "Not a good word to say" You are missing the point - if I was Lai, I would think Pulis was a hero with 10th position ( could have been eighth ). Lets face it - we would never improve on the likes of Everton in 7th!

    So why would Lai want to invest more. If I was him ( and I run many companies ), I would think Pulis was a feckin hero - profits are fat and the cash outlay super thin! Lai ( as would I ) would not give a flying feck about supporters who are irrelevant to the fat profits from Sky! Truth is - supporters mean not a lot especially when West Brom is not a global brand. Look no further than Bournemouth!

    So back to Lai ( and myself in his shoes ) - I would be laughing or pissing myself stupid with people blaming the manager who is just a paid employee for delivering what is wanted - mid table security!

    Do you get it! You are irrelevant, as am I, and anyone else! Not many can guarantee mid table security but Pulis can! Feck the entertainment says Lai ( shrewd businessman ), I invested in West Brom for profits. Entertainment is what happened in the Mowbray days where we scored three and conceded four!

    Lai is the clever one and those complaining about MR X delivering mid table security are the thick ones in the owners eyes ......................

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Gloucester
    Posts
    19,225
    Quote Originally Posted by baggieal View Post
    "Not a good word to say" You are missing the point - if I was Lai, I would think Pulis was a hero with 10th position ( could have been eighth ). Lets face it - we would never improve on the likes of Everton in 7th!

    So why would Lai want to invest more. If I was him ( and I run many companies ), I would think Pulis was a feckin hero - profits are fat and the cash outlay super thin! Lai ( as would I ) would not give a flying feck about supporters who are irrelevant to the fat profits from Sky! Truth is - supporters mean not a lot especially when West Brom is not a global brand. Look no further than Bournemouth!

    So back to Lai ( and myself in his shoes ) - I would be laughing or pissing myself stupid with people blaming the manager who is just a paid employee for delivering what is wanted - mid table security!

    Do you get it! You are irrelevant, as am I, and anyone else! Not many can guarantee mid table security but Pulis can! Feck the entertainment says Lai ( shrewd businessman ), I invested in West Brom for profits. Entertainment is what happened in the Mowbray days where we scored three and conceded four!

    Lai is the clever one and those complaining about MR X delivering mid table security are the thick ones in the owners eyes ......................
    However, this is a fan's forum not a " the greats of business forum" and as such folk on here want (well some do) entertainment. Eleven McClean's wouldn't supply that.
    Cunningham, Phillips, Johnston, Lukaku weren't noted for charging about the pitch but are bigger heroes than Owen, Wallwork, Gardner and the like.

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by holmleighchris View Post
    However, this is a fan's forum not a " the greats of business forum" and as such folk on here want (well some do) entertainment. Eleven McClean's wouldn't supply that.
    Cunningham, Phillips, Johnston, Lukaku weren't noted for charging about the pitch but are bigger heroes than Owen, Wallwork, Gardner and the like.
    Correct. Absolutely spot on.
    The likes of Cunningham wouldn't get in a Pulis team.
    What I don't get is people who aren't bothered about entertainment. The result is the be all and end all. If that's the case why go? Why not just look for the result?
    I am truly amazed how people seem to think that Pulis will guarantee us a mid table finish.where have the been for the past six months?
    They always throw the Mowbray scenario in aswell. As if playing entertaining football automatically gets you relegated.
    Totally Baffled

  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by baggieal View Post
    So why would Lai want to invest more. If I was him ( and I run many companies ), I would think Pulis was a feckin hero - profits are fat and the cash outlay super thin! Lai ( as would I ) would not give a flying feck about supporters who are irrelevant to the fat profits from Sky! Truth is - supporters mean not a lot especially when West Brom is not a global brand. Look no further than Bournemouth!

    So back to Lai ( and myself in his shoes ) - I would be laughing or pissing myself stupid with people blaming the manager who is just a paid employee for delivering what is wanted - mid table security!

    Do you get it! You are irrelevant, as am I, and anyone else! Not many can guarantee mid table security but Pulis can! Feck the entertainment says Lai ( shrewd businessman ), I invested in West Brom for profits. Entertainment is what happened in the Mowbray days where we scored three and conceded four!

    Lai is the clever one and those complaining about MR X delivering mid table security are the thick ones in the owners eyes ......................
    Please spare us all the bullsh*t, mate!

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by Whicka_Mon View Post
    Correct. Absolutely spot on.
    The likes of Cunningham wouldn't get in a Pulis team.
    What I don't get is people who aren't bothered about entertainment. The result is the be all and end all. If that's the case why go? Why not just look for the result?
    I am truly amazed how people seem to think that Pulis will guarantee us a mid table finish.where have the been for the past six months?
    They always throw the Mowbray scenario in aswell. As if playing entertaining football automatically gets you relegated.
    Totally Baffled

    From March onwards when we were on the beach it was crap! Up until, then the majority of the ground could not be singing Pulis' name loud enough! So so fickle are many West Brom supporters.

    It also seems there are more moans about Pulis from those who don't go to matches. If you don't go to a match - why watch a stream and still moan? Why not go to whatever you feel is more entertaining - a James Bond film perhaps or a porno! Whatever floats your boat!

    I hate Aldi but rather than whinge about it - I don't shop there! End of................................................ .

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by baggieal View Post
    From March onwards when we were on the beach it was crap! Up until, then the majority of the ground could not be singing Pulis' name loud enough! So so fickle are many West Brom supporters.

    It also seems there are more moans about Pulis from those who don't go to matches. If you don't go to a match - why watch a stream and still moan? Why not go to whatever you feel is more entertaining - a James Bond film perhaps or a porno! Whatever floats your boat!

    I hate Aldi but rather than whinge about it - I don't shop there! End of................................................ .
    No it wasn't from March it was from January. Check your FACTS our form since January places us in the bottom three. We were not on the beach our manager told us that he couldn't ask anymore from our players and they were working their socks off. I now he's a proven liar but still.
    The difference mate is i do go. I pay my money . I have the right to moan. I cannot stand Pulis never could. If i said i liked him i would be a hypocrite after what i said about him as Stoke manager. I have never song his name.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Whicka_Mon View Post
    No it wasn't from March it was from January. Check your FACTS our form since January places us in the bottom three. We were not on the beach our manager told us that he couldn't ask anymore from our players and they were working their socks off. I now he's a proven liar but still.
    The difference mate is i do go. I pay my money . I have the right to moan. I cannot stand Pulis never could. If i said i liked him i would be a hypocrite after what i said about him as Stoke manager. I have never song his name.
    . Just can't see your gripe,whoever is connected to the Albion you give your full support,no if or buts.ffs I even give my support to bobby Gould.

  17. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by albion68 View Post
    . Just can't see your gripe,whoever is connected to the Albion you give your full support,no if or buts.ffs I even give my support to bobby Gould.
    As did i mate and was down in Bath on that fateful day. I have never seen (or remember) in my forty years of going Albion approaching games with this mentality of not losing is better than winning. Even under Gould we were never this negative or it passed me by with the novelty of going to new gronds. It's just so bland and boring. This Pulis tenure is creating nothing in the way of memories.
    Why should i support something i know is not right or i don't agree with. I wish i could meet him. Why should we be happy or content with that drivel of football his team serves up.

  18. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Whicka_Mon View Post
    As did i mate and was down in Bath on that fateful day. I have never seen (or remember) in my forty years of going Albion approaching games with this mentality of not losing is better than winning. Even under Gould we were never this negative or it passed me by with the novelty of going to new gronds. It's just so bland and boring. This Pulis tenure is creating nothing in the way of memories.
    Why should i support something i know is not right or i don't agree with. I wish i could meet him. Why should we be happy or content with that drivel of football his team serves up.

    Bottom line is - you don't have to go! The majority of the supporters still want Pulis as they are realistic in that - no other fecker could do any better with the thread bare squad or investment ( or lack of it ) for new players.

    Sunderland supporters will have taken Pulis in a heartbeat - they are a bigger club than West Brom and have double the crowds. Moyes did a great job at Everton but he couldn't work miracles on the lack of investment at Sunderland. Villa are a bigger club than us and did not even see them entertaining in the chumpionship - did you?

    Don't get me wrong, I don't like Pulis personally, but there's no one better to keep us in the premiership. If that's a lack of ambition, then perhaps you should be directing your anger to the Board or our Chinese friend!

    Fact is - Lai will want to keep the Jeremy Peace business model - spend as little as you can and get a hard on when the profits are juicy. You can't have it both ways! Even Lai is not stupid enough to know - without 80 million plus we could never catch say Everton in 7th so to him Pulis will be a hero.

    Do you really think Lai will be bothered with whinges about Pulis or gates slightly dropping. Even Bournemouth know people through the turnstiles ( or lack of them ) is irrelevant with the big fat TV money.

    Football has changed and I loved the likes of Willie on the wing, and Cunningham like the next person. Football now is tactical and a bit like chess. You also set up shop not to lose.

    PS - with all the money that could blow West Brom away - did not see Man Utd playing sexy football last year - did you? Even many Man U supporters were bored ****less. Now with signing one player ( almost the worth of 50% ) of West Brom FC - they may be more sexy...................

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by baggieal View Post
    Bottom line is - you don't have to go! The majority of the supporters still want Pulis as they are realistic in that - no other fecker could do any better with the thread bare squad or investment ( or lack of it ) for new players.

    Sunderland supporters will have taken Pulis in a heartbeat - they are a bigger club than West Brom and have double the crowds. Moyes did a great job at Everton but he couldn't work miracles on the lack of investment at Sunderland. Villa are a bigger club than us and did not even see them entertaining in the chumpionship - did you?

    Don't get me wrong, I don't like Pulis personally, but there's no one better to keep us in the premiership. If that's a lack of ambition, then perhaps you should be directing your anger to the Board or our Chinese friend!

    Fact is - Lai will want to keep the Jeremy Peace business model - spend as little as you can and get a hard on when the profits are juicy. You can't have it both ways! Even Lai is not stupid enough to know - without 80 million plus we could never catch say Everton in 7th so to him Pulis will be a hero.

    Do you really think Lai will be bothered with whinges about Pulis or gates slightly dropping. Even Bournemouth know people through the turnstiles ( or lack of them ) is irrelevant with the big fat TV money.

    Football has changed and I loved the likes of Willie on the wing, and Cunningham like the next person. Football now is tactical and a bit like chess. You also set up shop not to lose.

    PS - with all the money that could blow West Brom away - did not see Man Utd playing sexy football last year - did you? Even many Man U supporters were bored ****less. Now with signing one player ( almost the worth of 50% ) of West Brom FC - they may be more sexy...................
    No the bottom line is. They don't have to play that way.
    No i'll go mate and i'll say if we play rubbish win,lose or draw.
    So you speak for the majority now do you ? I don't think so.
    Almost every single post you use the words Bournemouth or Sunderland or Defoe. I know how football works and the money behind it. Do you think i'm stupid ?
    That's no excuse for parking the bus against Middlesbrough both times.

    Now address the point of us having bottom three form since January (not March). Unable to score or keep a clean sheet. Then convince me Pulis will get us to mid table.

  20. #20
    We did most certainly not park the bus vs Middlesbrough away, we created several or indeed many good chances, but as so often, lacked class in front of goal. A very entertaining draw between two teams going forward, but (almost) unable to score.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •