+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: OT:FAO Villa

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    3,118

    OT:FAO Villa

    Dear Villa, you were right. I have just spotted my post on the FAO Geetarman thread and I did indeed call you an idiot. I apologise unreservedly and withdraw the comment.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    15,137
    Quote Originally Posted by monty_rhodes View Post
    Dear Villa, you were right. I have just spotted my post on the FAO Geetarman thread and I did indeed call you an idiot. I apologise unreservedly and withdraw the comment.
    Will you also withdraw calling me a w..anker?

    Thanks in anticipation.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    2,424
    Brin.....This is why folk don't post anymore....!

    .......not me "boring" folk about football realities and unquestionable facts and figures regarding Rotherham United.

    All open for debate as that is the function of this site.

    Football is all about opinions !

    As for "everyone has a right of an opinion"......frog.....coming from you that's laughable. As long as they agree with your mates frog.....eh!

    I've been reading bits and pieces over the last 3 weeks and I feel that many have really taken their eyes off the ball and need to recalibrate their football senses.

    So much schoolyard rubbish whether Thomas Rotherham ( RGS ) or Wingfield Comp' - It's so childish.

    The young man that beat us on his own
    ( for Fleetwood ) was nurtured by someone unworthy of our beloved club
    ( according to some ).....

    Get back to Football and this forum will flourish......

    ........Banning posters that offer fundamentally sound opinions to counteract historically and factually flawed opinions as facts is disturbing.

    Some posters that ignore patently obvious and documented realities are simply trying to re-write history.

    Freedom of speech - except on MM.

    STICK TO FOOTBALL PLEASE....!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    3,118
    Quote Originally Posted by kempo View Post
    Will you also withdraw calling me a w..anker?

    Thanks in anticipation.
    Not on your Nellie, Walter. Why has LBJ been allowed back on? It can only be a matter of time before the unhinged Wendun returns to MM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    2,424
    Monty - I apparently insulted posters when I patently did not and I took the threads off topic which again I did not do because others did that on numerous occasions and while doing so posted fiction as fact. I just go with the flow.

    I came back to offer a little advice.

    Grow up everyone.

    Reading these posts this last week or two has been embarrassing. And Monty / Kempo and some other reasonable posters have been dragged down to the lowest levels.

    Lead by example - don't get drawn into tip for tap rantings.....

    For example:

    "Why has LBJ been allowed back on? "

    Really.....definitely NOT a positive outcome for the RGS is it ?

    I'm not going to get involved in childish banter and and political sycophantic posts that have been extremely disappointing recently.

    If that's MM these days then you can have your own little - historically inept world.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    6,999
    Quote Originally Posted by lbj View Post
    The young man that beat us on his own
    ( for Fleetwood ) was nurtured by someone unworthy of our beloved club
    ( according to some ).....
    Please please please - No!
    This is obviously a prelude to another few hundred posts saying exactly the same thing.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    5,229
    Quote Originally Posted by monty_rhodes View Post
    Dear Villa, you were right. I have just spotted my post on the FAO Geetarman thread and I did indeed call you an idiot. I apologise unreservedly and withdraw the comment.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,989
    [QUOTE=monty_rhodes;38611217]Dear Villa, you were right. I have just spotted my post on the FAO Geetarman thread and I did indeed call you an idiot. I apologise unreservedly and withdraw the comment.[/QUOTE
    No problems pal ...all is good ......how the f.uck did lbj get on this thread ?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by lbj View Post
    Brin.....This is why folk don't post anymore....!

    .......not me "boring" folk about football realities and unquestionable facts and figures regarding Rotherham United.

    All open for debate as that is the function of this site.

    Football is all about opinions !

    As for "everyone has a right of an opinion"......frog.....coming from you that's laughable. As long as they agree with your mates frog.....eh!

    I've been reading bits and pieces over the last 3 weeks and I feel that many have really taken their eyes off the ball and need to recalibrate their football senses.

    So much schoolyard rubbish whether Thomas Rotherham ( RGS ) or Wingfield Comp' - It's so childish.

    The young man that beat us on his own
    ( for Fleetwood ) was nurtured by someone unworthy of our beloved club
    ( according to some ).....

    Get back to Football and this forum will flourish......

    ........Banning posters that offer fundamentally sound opinions to counteract historically and factually flawed opinions as facts is disturbing.

    Some posters that ignore patently obvious and documented realities are simply trying to re-write history.

    Freedom of speech - except on MM.

    STICK TO FOOTBALL PLEASE....!
    Good to see you back.

    People worse than you have escaped bans for things much worse than just being an irritating 2hat.

    I understand why Froggy did what he did but to be banned you should have to have done something really bad in my opinion. You never did, annoying/irritating, yes. But never abusive or hurtful.

    Long live the "Stubbs Lover".

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    10,122
    Quote Originally Posted by rileyev.the.third View Post
    Good to see you back.

    People worse than you have escaped bans for things much worse than just being an irritating 2hat.

    I understand why Froggy did what he did but to be banned you should have to have done something really bad in my opinion. You never did, annoying/irritating, yes. But never abusive or hurtful.

    Long live the "Stubbs Lover".
    Agree riley.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •