Elev8

[Ayamonteblade]

The only two drivers are Rawmarsh Mick McBrewer and Burglar Banno.

[FatherKnowsBest]

It'd be hilarious if that's the case.

'Related Party Transactions', they are called, and UEFA can just put a line through them in the calculations. I guess this is one of the reasons Mike Ashley doesn't have 'Sports Direct' on Newcastle shirts.

You have to wonder about a business plan for funding a football club that relies on selling tickets for three years hence, and the Chairman starting-up a sports kit manufacturer that doesn't seem able to produce shirts in volume, a yet to be launched Energy Drink and a local Taxi firm, just so they can provide sponsorship? Is it just me or does all this look kinda wierd?

[LesHiboux]

Well, trying to thwart FFP is a dirty business, and Booboo McCabe and the Prince will have to do something similar in the long run. How much money they've got isn't the issue. What they can spend is determined by the club's turnover, as I understand it. Mind you, that understanding could very well be flawed.

[rodcurrie]

Stop flirtin wi Marvin ya Floozy. UTCB

[FatherKnowsBest]

Well, trying to thwart FFP is a dirty business, and Booboo McCabe and the Prince will have to do something similar in the long run. How much money they've got isn't the issue. What they can spend is determined by the club's turnover, as I understand it. Mind you, that understanding could very well be flawed.

Squeezing inside the loopholes is one thing. This looks like 'Oh s***, We spent three years money in two seasons. It was promotion or bust, and we didn't get promotion. We're totally fecked. WTF do we do now??'

[Ayamonteblade]

Stop flirtin wi Marvin ya Floozy. UTCB

Gi oer!!!

[Holden_C]

Gi oer!!!

Not wanting to lead you on you understand Aya but unlike the others on here, I am, a gentleman.

[Holden_C]

Well, trying to thwart FFP is a dirty business, and Booboo McCabe and the Prince will have to do something similar in the long run. How much money they've got isn't the issue. What they can spend is determined by the club's turnover, as I understand it. Mind you, that understanding could very well be flawed.

No it's to do with limiting losses over a three year period. Currently you can lose £39m in that time. You lost almost ten million in 2016 and had a much bigger wage bill last year. So you could already be well more than half way there.

[Holden_C]

Stop flirtin wi Marvin ya Floozy. UTCB

Green eyed Rod?

[Ayamonteblade]

Not wanting to lead you on you understand Aya but unlike the others on here, I am, a gentleman.

He's stirring CH - must have finished his ironing early today