+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Sheridan et al ...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    4,784
    I still think that it was a "sacking of convenience" & if we had won the previous 10 matches wouldn't have happened, but with the evidence that has been made public Sheridan has no defence & I find it disgusting that the LMA are backing him.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    866
    Quote Originally Posted by ancientpie View Post
    I still think that it was a "sacking of convenience" & if we had won the previous 10 matches wouldn't have happened, but with the evidence that has been made public Sheridan has no defence & I find it disgusting that the LMA are backing him.
    Surely this depends on what was in his contract ? If effing and blinding is described as gross misconduct then he's lost. If it isn't referred to then the court/tribunal may consider it normal in his job.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    11,112
    Quote Originally Posted by JoePass View Post
    Is the right answer. But his name is Jack.
    Was he christened Jack? The reason I ask because Johns were often called Jack, a bit like Henrys being called Harry.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •