The results as they should have been using expected goals

[oldcolner]

Not sure what to make of these but The Expected goals figures below show we should have lost 0-2.
Did they expect Wood to miss??
WBA should have beaten BHA 1-0
Leicester should have beaten Chelsea


Saturday
5-0 Manchester City v Liverpool. 2.38 - 0.7
3-0 Arsenal v AFC Bournemouth 2.25 -0.46
3-1 Brighton v West Brom Albion 0.44-1.03
0-3 Everton v Tottenham Hotspur 1.04-1.81
1-2 Leicester City v Chelsea. 1.4-0.83
0-2 Southampton v Watford. 0.3-0.72
2-2 Stoke C v Manchester United 1.23-2.35

Sunday
1-0 Burnley v Crystal Palace 0.28- 1.98
0-1 Swansea City. v Newcastle 1.2-1.11

Monday
West Ham Utd v Huddersfield

[Supersub6]

This is based on the number of shots etc., however, it is worth comparing the percentage of shots on target which I have added

Saturday
5-0 Manchester City v Liverpool. 2.38 - 0.7 77% - 43%
3-0 Arsenal v AFC Bournemouth 2.25 -0.46 53% - 16%
3-1 Brighton v West Brom Albion 0.44-1.03 50% - 25%
0-3 Everton v Tottenham Hotspur 1.04-1.81 8% - 40%
1-2 Leicester City v Chelsea. 1.4-0.83 25% - 37%
0-2 Southampton v Watford. 0.3-0.72 11% - 25%
2-2 Stoke C v Manchester United 1.23-2.35 50% - 45%

Sunday
1-0 Burnley v Crystal Palace 0.28- 1.98 50% - 17%
0-1 Swansea City. v Newcastle 1.2-1.11 40% - 50%

All the results went according to shot accuracy except the Stoke v Man Utd match which only had a 5% difference between the teams and ended in a draw.

[oldcolner]

Supersub
Seems like you invented a better indicator than EGs. Take the patent out?