COUTTS out of the derby?

[charliejoejohn2]

No-one has said the referees couldn't agree. They didn't even discuss it. They were asked independently of each other for their view of the incident. All three could have said there was nothing in it for all we know and that is the more likely scenario. For Coutts to be charged all three would have had to say independent of each other it was a red card offence. They didn't. Process explained in attached.

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/f...-what-11173785

Good idea that!!

[rodcurrie]

No-one has said the referees couldn't agree. They didn't even discuss it. They were asked independently of each other for their view of the incident. All three could have said there was nothing in it for all we know and that is the more likely scenario. For Coutts to be charged all three would have had to say independent of each other it was a red card offence. They didn't. Process explained in attached.

http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/sport/f...-what-11173785

They couldn't agree a majority decision accordin to the piece i read..UTCB

[rodcurrie]

That'll be the piece that Shields wrote that was factually incorrect. They never agreed anything with anyone as they were asked for their own independent view.

I know they were asked independently,the point is that if 2 thought it was a red card incident and one didn't then obviously it wasn't unaminous,hence no action bein taken.It was Shields article i saw by the way,i shudda known summat was incorrect.UTCB