OT: Come on, Mr Swale

[sidders]

If post 222 on the Theresa fred is acceptable on this board then we're reaching new lows. Surely we can have differing views without such personal abuse. Having said that, it shows a lot more about the poster than the object of his derision.Not good enough though.

[HAPPYMAGPIEHAPPY]

Awww Diddums

[optipez]

Sidders, most of the unpleasantness on this board originates with you and your political postings.
You use words reasonably well, avoid getting close to being banned, being overtly offensive or overly confrontational.
You do however drip poison onto every thread you go near, seek to close down debate, and use this football message board as your own political pulpit.
That you're a bore is undeniable, that you're divisive is too, but what is the most offensive thing on this board is your efforts to wind people up, usually people with inferior English language skills, box them into a corner where they write something they probably shouldn't , then run to a moderator to get posts and people banned. You are a bully, a condescending one at that.
Your life must be empty for the effort you put into these threads and the misanthropy you spew out pretty much on a daily basis.
You've become a husk of a man, a sad, sad little malformed thing.

[seriouspie]

If post 222 on the Theresa fred is acceptable on this board then we're reaching new lows. Surely we can have differing views without such personal abuse. Having said that, it shows a lot more about the poster than the object of his derision.Not good enough though.

Ho! Ho! you snivelling little nondescript. As I've said many times - when the pace quickens, the strong get running and the weak cry babies want to run back to Mummy. If what I posted was a reply to yourself then fine but it was to BFP who to be frank uses far more personal insults at times and everybody knows it. But no, this really isn't the truth is it Snivelling Sid? It's simply you don't like my views and no matter what you say, pray or preach, there is not a cat in hells chance of your Marxist views changing the ones I believe in.

What are you trying to do Weakling - get me banned? O.K. carry on Sunshine, we'll have to await the outcome won't we. Try asking Cher for advice as well because if she's like 'Big G' her dad who I knew well, she'll chuck you off this board - not me. But I don't play life like that boy ..... look people in the eye and tell 'em .... don't use a third party as an excuse.

I would suggest most on this board are sick to the back teeth of your pompous ramblings, anti British views and your so called journalistic skills. Referring back to an earlier post which entailed you informing me you trained with John Whetton ......... I replied to this with an apology..... but received no acknowledgement. Yes my old lad - stop whimpering and man up, your rag tag crew of 'Thinkers' and 'Book reading Marxists' are going nowhere.

[HAPPYMAGPIEHAPPY]

Ho! Ho! you snivelling little nondescript. As I've said many times - when the pace quickens, the strong get running and the weak cry babies want to run back to Mummy. If what I posted was a reply to yourself then fine but it was to BFP who to be frank uses far more personal insults at times and everybody knows it. But no, this really isn't the truth is it Snivelling Sid? It's simply you don't like my views and no matter what you say, pray or preach, there is not a cat in hells chance of your Marxist views changing the ones I believe in.

What are you trying to do Weakling - get me banned? O.K. carry on Sunshine, we'll have to await the outcome won't we. Try asking Cher for advice as well because if she's like 'Big G' her dad who I knew well, she'll chuck you off this board - not me. But I don't play life like that boy ..... look people in the eye and tell 'em .... don't use a third party as an excuse.

I would suggest most on this board are sick to the back teeth of your pompous ramblings, anti British views and your so called journalistic skills. Referring back to an earlier post which entailed you informing me you trained with John Whetton ......... I replied to this with an apology..... but received no acknowledgement. Yes my old lad - stop whimpering and man up, your rag tag crew of 'Thinkers' and 'Book reading Marxists' are going nowhere.

I’ve not even bothered to look at thread to see what was posted but I can’t argue with any of the above !

[SwalePie]

I’ve not even bothered to look at thread to see what was posted but I can’t argue with any of the above !

I would rather stick thumbtacks in my eyes while drinking Domestos from a dirty sock than read through all of the mind-numbing off topic threads in case someone has said something unpleasant. Feel free to make a report if there's something untoward.

P.S. The very fact that it's post number 222 on a political thread hopefully illustrates my point for the masses. I didn't sign up for that on a football forum.

[sidders]

Sidders, most of the unpleasantness on this board originates with you and your political postings.
You use words reasonably well, avoid getting close to being banned, being overtly offensive or overly confrontational.
You do however drip poison onto every thread you go near, seek to close down debate, and use this football message board as your own political pulpit.
That you're a bore is undeniable, that you're divisive is too, but what is the most offensive thing on this board is your efforts to wind people up, usually people with inferior English language skills, box them into a corner where they write something they probably shouldn't , then run to a moderator to get posts and people banned. You are a bully, a condescending one at that.
Your life must be empty for the effort you put into these threads and the misanthropy you spew out pretty much on a daily basis.
You've become a husk of a man, a sad, sad little malformed thing.

That first sentence is a helluva claim, Optipez, and one which I have no problem refuting. In fact, your entire post is full of garbage. There is a world of difference between confronting someone's opinion and personally abusing them. You accuse me of 'dripping poison' - can you give any actual examples? Oh no, you can't be bothered, can you?
As For NCM taking up most of my day...because I am working on t'internet most of the day, I use NCM as a break between tasks so it's actually a form of relaxation.
By the way, I receive positive feedback from people on NCM who use the private message facility so your view is also a limited one.

As for Serious, has it always been your tactic in life to rubbish people you identify as opponents? If I was a Marxist, I would happily own up to it, but I'm not. You will also note that I have distinct unease about Corbyn and Momentum.
You are entitled to your views but of of course I think most of them are mistaken. However, I can say that without resorting to calling you little, snivelling, tw*t, nondescript.

[HAPPYMAGPIEHAPPY]

Haven’t Hull city got a game today for you to grumble over ?

[BigFatPie]

Thanks for the intervention Sid, but there’s no need. If you upset reactionary knuckle draggers like seriouspie, you’ve got to expect a reaction. It’s like poking at an old dog or something.

And my rollox gag was great.

[seriouspie]

That first sentence is a helluva claim, Optipez, and one which I have no problem refuting. In fact, your entire post is full of garbage. There is a world of difference between confronting someone's opinion and personally abusing them. You accuse me of 'dripping poison' - can you give any actual examples? Oh no, you can't be bothered, can you?
As For NCM taking up most of my day...because I am working on t'internet most of the day, I use NCM as a break between tasks so it's actually a form of relaxation.
By the way, I receive positive feedback from people on NCM who use the private message facility so your view is also a limited one.

As for Serious, has it always been your tactic in life to rubbish people you identify as opponents? If I was a Marxist, I would happily own up to it, but I'm not. You will also note that I have distinct unease about Corbyn and Momentum.
You are entitled to your views but of of course I think most of them are mistaken. However, I can say that without resorting to calling you little, snivelling, tw*t, nondescript.

No ....in the past you have called me a 'nasty piece of work' a 'hoodlum' etc etc .......it doesn't worry me one iota, please carry on. I of course will carry on attacking you as and when I feel fit. If there is one thing that annoys me (obviously my age has something to do with it) it is not so much your RW Socialist views, rather the impression you give of being anti Royalist, anti this and that and really not being proud to be an Englishman.

Back to the topic in hand. I would no longer complain to the Mods on this board than I would support Forest. I think this very fact has summed up your personality to a tee and deserving of certain adjectives I've used.

I'm only passing comment on the fact....... nothing more..... but it seems by the comments already coming in I'm not far out in my views.