+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Player ratings v West Ham

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    13,001

    Player ratings v West Ham

    Sky

    Burnley: Pope (6), Lowton (6), Ward (7), Tarkowski (6), Mee (6), Brady (7), Cork (6), Hendrick (6), Defour (8), Arfield (6), Wood (7)

    Subs: Gudmundsson (8),Vokes (7), Barnes (6)

  2. #2
    Vokes, Wood and Barnes playing in a front three are a proper bloody handful that's for sure!

    Attachment 6837

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    13,001
    Mail
    Burnley (4-4-1-1): Pope 6; Lowton 6, Tarkowski 6, Mee 5.5, Ward 6 (Barnes 81); Brady 6, Cork 6, Defour 7, Arfield 5 (Gudmundsson 46, 7); Hendrick 5 (Vokes 46, 6.5); Wood 7

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...#ixzz4vZR4Dz9H

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    13,001
    LET
    Nick Pope 6

    Saves he had to make were routine. Can’t have expected Mee to miss Hart’s clearance for first goal

    Matt Lowton 7

    Linked well with Brady in the first half when the Irishman went inside. So close to second half goal

    James Tarkowski 7

    Was winning his battle with Carroll until the striker became frustrated. Almost a shame we didn’t see more of it

    Ben Mee 5

    Mistakes are rare from Mee but he should have easily cleared Hart’s clearance for the goal, probably with his head

    Stephen Ward 6
    Tough afternoon against Antonio, going in both directions. Been superb recently, but below par here

    Robbie Brady 6
    Always looking for the ball and to get involved, excellent attitude even if things didn’t go for him, which they often didn’t

    Jack Cork 7
    A solid performance, but probably needed a bit more incision when looking to break down 10 men

    Steven Defour 8 (Man of the Match)
    Narrowly shades JBG for man of the match. Fitness levels compared to last year are incredible, almost leads the pressing game from midfield now. Quality on the ball, although couldn’t provide the ammunition to open West Ham up

    Scott Arfield 6
    Didn’t do much wrong but no surprise he was taken off at half-time when creativity was called for

    Jeff Hendrick 5
    Not at his best in the first half, obvious candidate to make way when Dyche went for 4-4-2

    Chris Wood 7
    Took his goal well. Could have won a penalty which came from one of several clever runs in behind

    Subs

    Johann Berg Gudmundsson for Arfield (45) 8
    Made an impact from the bench. Hit the post with his own shot before setting up Wood’s goal

    Sam Vokes for Hendrick (45) 6
    Didn’t have the same impact as JBG, but didn’t have the service he needed either

    Ashley Barnes for Ward (81)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    4,634
    LET assessment is fair.

    Dyche was spot on with his substitutions at half time and taking off Ward and moving Brady back in the last 10 minutes to accommodate Barnes was a big decision and got us the point.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by thedonz View Post
    LET assessment is fair.

    Dyche was spot on with his substitutions at half time and taking off Ward and moving Brady back in the last 10 minutes to accommodate Barnes was a big decision and got us the point.
    I agree 100% with that opinion Donzy, SD's substitutions were spot on but we now have the players to change it!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    39,251
    JGB 10/10
    Wood 8/10

    Carroll a 10/10 five star performance

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •