It's a metaphor, not a direct moral comparison. That was obvious, surely?
You don't think some folk are just bored? I've been as critical as anyone about some of the performances in big games. But I can't see any rational reason to suggest it is likely that a replacement would do a better job overall than McInnes. Jack Ross is a promising young manager but it's delusional to suggest that he isn't unproven at the top level. "We need someone who can have a right go at the Tims/H*ns!" doesn't qualify as a rational reason.