How do you put a poster on ignore?

[ghostrider]

Don't bite Stan, he's craving attention again.

Who's really craving the attention?
A topic was put up to ask how to ignore someone (clearly p'boro).

After the person is told how to ignore p,boro, the very same person responds to p,boro in a derogatory way as if the entire topic was set up to goad him in.

The person really craving attention is stanleymag for putting the topic up when it wasn't needed and could have easily been asked via pm to many of his close internet forum friends he seems to have on here, the moaning minnie.


How about stop moaning stanleymag and take each poster as they come, good, bad or indifferent and that way you won't feel the need to get your knickers in a twist.

And yeah, I am taking up for p'boro, because it appears only his stuff is deemed worthy of digs whilst other diggers get a pat on the back for goading him.
He's not frigging nasty or anything so what's the effing problem?

[toptoon]

He's not frigging nasty or anything so what's the effing problem?

The problem is tedium.

I know someone (a distant relative) who lies all of the time for the sake of it, even when it brings him no advantage. The result is that he has become one of the most boring people to speak to because there is no basis to any conversation. You know he´s either lying or that he´ll be saying the complete opposite next time you speak to him - so what´s the point of having a conversation?

I think it´s similar with Pboro and why people are putting him on ignore or not bothering to reply to his posts because it´s just plain boring (he clearly hasn´t realised this yet and thinks he´s getting a rise out of people).

[waalsendmick]

to be fair to stan, it was me who mentioned pboro.

also, stan posted this BEFORE the match, not AFTER a 4-1 defeat as pboro stated.

my bad!

[pboromag]

The problem is tedium.

I know someone (a distant relative) who lies all of the time for the sake of it, even when it brings him no advantage. The result is that he has become one of the most boring people to speak to because there is no basis to any conversation. You know he´s either lying or that he´ll be saying the complete opposite next time you speak to him - so what´s the point of having a conversation?

I think it´s similar with Pboro and why people are putting him on ignore or not bothering to reply to his posts because it´s just plain boring (he clearly hasn´t realised this yet and thinks he´s getting a rise out of people).

i quite clearly am
or you wouldnt be wasting your time replying
all stanley had to do was pm a mod
im sure they would have all helped him out

remember i hadnt been on for a week so why the thread was needed i do not know

i quite like being ignored
when i had obsessed people following me around the board commenting on my everyword it was like being stalked by gary glitter and paul rubens

[pboromag]

to be fair to stan, it was me who mentioned pboro.

also, stan posted this BEFORE the match, not AFTER a 4-1 defeat as pboro stated.

my bad!

when i hadnt been on for a week

if he had started it after the match so be it he may not like my views but obsessed idiots stirring it like you do no good for the board

[waalsendmick]

slightly ironic.

[pboromag]

you are right he didnt say it was me he wanted to block
just obsessed sheep like you who pressume it was me

maybe hie is a match going fan like me and had he had had enough of the armchairs copying and pasting nonsense statistics who quite clearly have no idea about footy other than what match stat .com tell them

[Cannylad]

Who's really craving the attention?
A topic was put up to ask how to ignore someone (clearly p'boro).

After the person is told how to ignore p,boro, the very same person responds to p,boro in a derogatory way as if the entire topic was set up to goad him in.

The person really craving attention is stanleymag for putting the topic up when it wasn't needed and could have easily been asked via pm to many of his close internet forum friends he seems to have on here, the moaning minnie.


How about stop moaning stanleymag and take each poster as they come, good, bad or indifferent and that way you won't feel the need to get your knickers in a twist.

And yeah, I am taking up for p'boro, because it appears only his stuff is deemed worthy of digs whilst other diggers get a pat on the back for goading him.
He's not frigging nasty or anything so what's the effing problem?

OK Ghostboro, if that's what you think

[ghostrider]

The problem is tedium.

I know someone (a distant relative) who lies all of the time for the sake of it, even when it brings him no advantage. The result is that he has become one of the most boring people to speak to because there is no basis to any conversation. You know he´s either lying or that he´ll be saying the complete opposite next time you speak to him - so what´s the point of having a conversation?

I think it´s similar with Pboro and why people are putting him on ignore or not bothering to reply to his posts because it´s just plain boring (he clearly hasn´t realised this yet and thinks he´s getting a rise out of people).

Fine, but the topic is titled as it is to bring him in, not to ignore him, otherwise stanleymag wouldn't have replied to him without quote.
If people want to ignore him for being what you say he is, then just do it and be done with it.

The stark reality is, p,boro adds interest ot the forum whether it's agreed with, disagreed with or just for people to have a dig at him knowing they will be backed up to the hilt and he will be basically left to answer to a host of people all having a pop, which makes him look like some kind of trouble maker when the truth is he's creating talking points.

[toptoon]

The stark reality is, p,boro adds interest ot the forum

That´s where I fundamentally disagree with you.