Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 166

Thread: Leeds United - v - Nottingham Forest ***Matchday Thread***

  1. #121
    Quote Originally Posted by BenidormBlanco View Post
    cock.
    Missed the second word BB - "Sucker"

  2. #122
    Quote Originally Posted by Tichi1 View Post
    Missed the second word BB - "Sucker"
    Takes one to know one.

  3. #123
    Anyone can beat anyone in this league, simple, look at Burton beating someone 3-0 away, yet when they played away at Leeds we destroyed them 5-0, stop looking at the small picture and look at the big picture, we are 6th in the league, it took the former premier league champions to knock us out of the league Cup, we are doing alright right now, I hate to think how negative folk would be if we were in a relegation battle!!!!

  4. #124
    Quote Originally Posted by Tichi1 View Post
    Missed the second word BB - "Sucker"
    made me chuckle that did!
    the boy brings it on himself though, have you seen his comments on the thread regarding the new lad?
    19 yrs old, big central defensive unit, scandinavian, those of a positive persuassion might think we are looking at the next 10 years, a partnership to rival Woody/Ferdinand..... but this tool is slagging him off before hes kicked a ball.

  5. #125
    Quote Originally Posted by BenidormBlanco View Post
    made me chuckle that did!
    the boy brings it on himself though, have you seen his comments on the thread regarding the new lad?
    19 yrs old, big central defensive unit, scandinavian, those of a positive persuassion might think we are looking at the next 10 years, a partnership to rival Woody/Ferdinand..... but this tool is slagging him off before hes kicked a ball.
    "Next ten years"???????

    Sure, he is 19, so young enough to develop, and tall, so has some physical presence, but ""we are looking at the next 10 years"????? Not me who is deluded pal. Unless we are competitive in the first team, NOW, then it doesn't matter how many punts Orta takes, we will stay in the Championship (or worse), and (not for the first time) those who show class and potential and who see Leeds going nowhere fast, will either seek to leave or will be cherry picked (and there are plenty of recent examples that show precisely that happening).

    We DO NOT HAVE ten years to develop, and will only be able to protect ourselves from the predations of clubs in the PL if we are there too, and even then it will be a hard ask. IF Radrizzani and Orta genuinely believe in a development squad, and that Leonora really is a feeder club, the only way that strategy can be realised is if they invest in those players who will get us into the PL, something our new Scandinavian import isn't.

  6. #126
    Do you watch LUFC at all? We are competitive NOW plenty of clean steets this season, even with your "dodgy keeper" so that makes the back 4 solid IMO, one for the future, and cover if needed. Cant see much change in the Jansson/Cooper partnership thats coming along nicely despite my reservations about Cooper.
    Just dont understand what youre so effin uptight about this time?(other than the obvious, hes foreign, signed by a foreigner to play under a foreigner.)

  7. #127
    Quote Originally Posted by BenidormBlanco View Post
    Do you watch LUFC at all? We are competitive NOW plenty of clean steets this season, even with your "dodgy keeper" so that makes the back 4 solid IMO, one for the future, and cover if needed. Cant see much change in the Jansson/Cooper partnership thats coming along nicely despite my reservations about Cooper.
    Just dont understand what youre so effin uptight about this time?(other than the obvious, hes foreign, signed by a foreigner to play under a foreigner.)
    Either at the ground, (home or away) or on the box, I suspect I see as much, if not more than you do, and we are NOT competitive. We have performed abysmally over that last fortnight and our wins were fortuitous, not the result of domination that the league position might suggest.

    "The back four are solid"?? Delusional again, they are not solid, they are scared!

    And why am I exercised about this signing? You're spot on, (about the "foreign" thing), but as usual wide of the mark. Its the paucity of ideas, the impecunity of the clubs funding, the myopia regarding where they look for new talent, and the repetition of failed initiatives that pi55es me off, none of which has anything to do with the nationality of the new player.

  8. #128
    ive seen every game this season in one way or another, weve had plenty of clean sheets, our back 4 look better all the time and we ARE competitve because the ****in table tells you that we are!

  9. #129
    Quote Originally Posted by BenidormBlanco View Post
    ive seen every game this season in one way or another, weve had plenty of clean sheets, our back 4 look better all the time and we ARE competitve because the ****in table tells you that we are!
    Lies, damned lies, and statistics. You can tell anything with figures, depending how you slice and dice it. Fact is, we face serious challenges, and we're not playing like a promotion-contending team. There are plenty who would agree, we will see, won't we?

  10. #130
    your right, we have a cr@p keeper and play like a bottom 6 side, will finish bottom 6, and thats despite spending almost all season in the top 6, perfectly understand your logic and agree wholeheartedly. Team full of shighte foreigners, bring back Michael Brown and Barndoor Billy.

  11. #131
    Quote Originally Posted by WTF11 View Post
    Either at the ground, (home or away) or on the box, I suspect I see as much, if not more than you do, and we are NOT competitive. We

    have performed abysmally over that last fortnight and our wins were fortuitous, not the result of domination that the league position might suggest.

    "The back four are solid"?? Delusional again, they are not solid, they are scared!

    And why am I exercised about this signing? You're spot on, (about the "foreign" thing), but as usual wide of the mark. Its the paucity of ideas, the impecunity of the clubs funding, the myopia regarding where they look for new talent, and the repetition of failed initiatives that pi55es me off, none of which has anything to do with the nationality of the new player.
    I've been as disappointed as anyone with some of our recent performances, but if we weren't at least competitive this season, wouldn't we be in the bottom six instead of the top six???

  12. #132
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozwhites View Post
    I've been as disappointed as anyone with some of our recent performances, but if we weren't at least competitive this season, wouldn't we be in the bottom six instead of the top six???
    Lucky is not the same as competitive.

  13. #133
    So do you reckon all 13 wins so far have been lucky?

  14. #134
    Quote Originally Posted by Ozwhites View Post
    So do you reckon all 13 wins so far have been lucky?
    No, but at least 4 have. And how long do you expect "lucky" to last as a playing strategy?

  15. #135
    Quote Originally Posted by WTF11 View Post
    No, but at least 4 have. And how long do you expect "lucky" to last as a playing strategy?
    There were probably a couple we drew that I thought we deserved to win also, having the better of the game. But...let's say you are right and were lucky to win 4 of them. We'd probably still earn a point from those in most instances....and added to the 9 wins, would still give us enough points to be mid table somewhere. Whether I thought that was acceptable or not, I would still say that we were at least "competitive" to be in that area. Particularly with half the teams still below us! To be "uncompetive" would mean we wouldn't be able to compete against anyone in this league. 😮 Maybe your choice of wording was a little over the top?...

  16. #136
    Quote Originally Posted by WTF11 View Post
    And why am I exercised about this signing? You're spot on, (about the "foreign" thing), but as usual wide of the mark. Its the paucity of ideas, the impecunity of the clubs funding, the myopia regarding where they look for new talent, and the repetition of failed initiatives that pi55es me off, none of which has anything to do with the nationality of the new player.
    Swallowing a dictionary and spouting sh yte doesn't make you right - just fecking ludicrous
    Sad-sack

  17. #137
    Quote Originally Posted by BenidormBlanco View Post
    made me chuckle that did!
    the boy brings it on himself though, have you seen his comments on the thread regarding the new lad?
    19 yrs old, big central defensive unit, scandinavian, those of a positive persuassion might think we are looking at the next 10 years, a partnership to rival Woody/Ferdinand..... but this tool is slagging him off before hes kicked a ball.
    Last three years he's been on one at every single opportunity, Foreigners, Investment, Managers, Owners, lack of effort, no tactical nous, **** second raters, yada yada

    He's never going to change or be happy with anything LUFC - Like i've said before his missus must have a dreadful time at home listening to his doom and gloom.....,

    Anyway, can't chit chat - gotta get myself off to Cuba...

  18. #138
    Thing is though, what has a lot of these posts got to do with the forest match?

  19. #139
    Quote Originally Posted by Tichi1 View Post
    Swallowing a dictionary and spouting sh yte doesn't make you right - just fecking ludicrous
    Sad-sack
    Your opinion BB (maybe others), do I care? Errrrr.....not a lot.

  20. #140
    Quote Originally Posted by CLIVETHELEEDSFAN View Post
    Thing is though, what has a lot of these posts got to do with the forest match?
    It started out as a discussion on the game and how sh1te we were, then the reasons, then how to address the problems, then how ludicrous my comments are = same sh1t, different day.

Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •