Reply With QuoteGot to play them to get them fit. Both looked useful to me. People knock what I say but I could see 5 across the middle with a fit Lavery on his own up front.
Hall Of Fame
Hall Of Fame
Got to play them to get them fit. Both looked useful to me. People knock what I say but I could see 5 across the middle with a fit Lavery on his own up front.
Hall Of Fame
Both seem to fit into the "Warne Concept" in that they are young, energetic, skillful and enthusiastic. I also believe that when they are "fit" they will be a great addition to the squad. If Towell is fit for Saturday, I think he will get the shirt, but the nice thing at the moment is that the bench looks quite strong and has proved to be effective in the last few games.
Personally, I don't think that Warne will stack midfield because its not in his nature to try and get a draw. And, why change the shape of a winning system?
Hall Of Fame
You'd drop two players who have scored three goals in the last two games, and play one up front who "isn't up to speed" and who has scored once all season?Originally Posted by gwru
Don't you back the "form horse"?
Hall Of Fame
I'm thinking two tough away games this month, 5 across midfield & one up front. Couldn't see Smith or Ball being the loan striker. But is Lavery up to speed? But now Palmer has got in the side like to keep him there. Only way we'll get him match sharp.
Hall Of Fame
Smith and Ball are our players, not on loan. Did you mean "lone striker", as in on his Jacksey, maybe?
Hall Of Fame
Mean on his Jacksey yes. Rodak Emmanuel & Towell are on loan but are in the side on merit. I liked look of Lavery when he came on. Get him match fit an asset.
Hall Of Fame
Lavery wouldn't be in the side on merit though.
Hall Of Fame
Not yet. But only way is to play him. I'm not a massive fan of either Smith or Ball. Both bog standard league 1 players. Good enough for were we are. Lavery has more scope.
Hall Of Fame
Here we go again...
Posting Permissions