O/T Unilever

[great_fire]

This bloke is increasingly getting more rabid by the day...

Now, we all know there's issues with immigration and have seen effects both good and bad for the region and indeed the country, and that the issue is in urgent need of proper, sensible attention from all sides of the argument, but to continually jump onto ANY topic with the same, inaccurate bullshine is quite frankly pathetic.

What's rabid about it?

Just common sense.

Most "refugees" are economic migrants, as you can tell by the fact that almost all of them are men in their 20s.

Your beloved Welfare State won't last much longer unless immigration is curbed, you can't have so many people taking out without paying in.

[millmoormagic]

What's rabid about it?

Just common sense.

Most "refugees" are economic migrants, as you can tell by the fact that almost all of them are men in their 20s.

Your beloved Welfare State won't last much longer unless immigration is curbed, you can't have so many people taking out without paying in.

Wow, how many times do you need to be told, immigration has had a NETT effect monetarily on the country, that means they put more in than they take out, that is FACT, what can't you get about that...the other facts are that this gov't is consistently and deliberately underfunding the welfare state...once again, your argument is poor to say the least, and can only lead to one conclusion really...

[ragingpup]

What's rabid about it?

Just common sense.

Most "refugees" are economic migrants, as you can tell by the fact that almost all of them are men in their 20s.

Your beloved Welfare State won't last much longer unless immigration is curbed, you can't have so many people taking out without paying in.

"Most refugees are economic migrants". Please could you back that up with a % figure of economic migrants as opposed to genuine migrants and quote your source?

[great_fire]

Wow, how many times do you need to be told, immigration has had a NETT effect monetarily on the country, that means they put more in than they take out, that is FACT, what can't you get about that...the other facts are that this gov't is consistently and deliberately underfunding the welfare state...once again, your argument is poor to say the least, and can only lead to one conclusion really...

Bull****, immigration costs are £17 billion a year.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...n-UK-year.html

Sweden told their citizens immigrants would pay for their pensions, then raised the pension age to 70 to pay for the immigrants' benefits!

[great_fire]

"Most refugees are economic migrants". Please could you back that up with a % figure of economic migrants as opposed to genuine migrants and quote your source?

Even the pro-immigration, pro-open borders UN says 7/10 are so you can bet it's actually higher.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world...-boat-crossing

[great_fire]

Wow, how many times do you need to be told, immigration has had a NETT effect monetarily on the country, that means they put more in than they take out, that is FACT, what can't you get about that...the other facts are that this gov't is consistently and deliberately underfunding the welfare state...once again, your argument is poor to say the least, and can only lead to one conclusion really...

"19.8% of Muslims aged 16-to-74 were in full-time employment."

Net benefit? Paying more in than they take out?

You're shilling for the globalists.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...ce-study-finds

[millmoormagic]

Bull****, immigration costs are £17 billion a year.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...n-UK-year.html

Sweden told their citizens immigrants would pay for their pensions, then raised the pension age to 70 to pay for the immigrants' benefits!

Haha, you really have lost the plot.

[millmoormagic]

"19.8% of Muslims aged 16-to-74 were in full-time employment."

Net benefit? Paying more in than they take out?

You're shilling for the globalists.

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...ce-study-finds

😂😂how ironic that you've posted a link that goes to a piece with the headline...

"Islamaphobia holding back UK Muslims in workplace"

Furthermore, it does state UK Muslims, not immigrants, not refugees, you've really excelled yourself this time fella...

[great_fire]

����how ironic that you've posted a link that goes to a piece with the headline...

"Islamaphobia holding back UK Muslims in workplace"

Furthermore, it does state UK Muslims, not immigrants, not refugees, you've really excelled yourself this time fella...

It was a Guardian link, of course that's the slant they'd put on it. Are you disputing the figures?

It was the other thing you should have been disputing, they've actually raised the retirement age to 64 from 61 with plans to raise it further, to around 69, all to pay for the open-door immigration policy when they told the Swedish people the immigrants would pay for their pensions.

You must be just as gullible as them is you believe immigration is a net benefit, none of those calculations in the past took account of their use of public services like the study in the link I posted does.

And you haven't explained how a group of people, less than 20% of whom are in full employment can be a net benefit to the economy, isn't it the truth that we are subsidising them with our taxes?

[great_fire]

Where did all these bloody lefties come from anyway?

I blame Comrade Corbyn.