Well, I saw enough in the game against Kilmarnock.
He's still been treated harshly here though.
Wonder if Brenda would have had Woodman between the sticks in Thursday's Libson eclipsing triumph had they gazumped the loan deal. Looks a bit lightweight, positionally suspect and nervous - the latter being fairly understandable if Considine and O'Connor form half or two thirds of your defensive line.
At least the manager will correct the matter in the summer and draft in Alexander Mk II. With any luck he might address the defensive personnel also if he's on top of the holding midfielder situation.
But the problem is McInnes did neither. He signed up a kid with hardly any experience. If we had signed a Cammy Bell like character, then fair enough. But we signed a kid with experience similar to our own reserve keeper. Our manager loves a loan in. Fair enough 1 or 2, but we have 5 or 6.
We did what we could in a restricted market. The guy played well for Killie last year, and Celtic wanted him. In fact, if he hadn't had a bit more integrity than most he'd be at Parkhead now. Any new signing's a risk, but we'd every reason to believe we'd done well to get him.
Is there a notable difference in quality between the two?
Rogers looked dodgy in Dingwall but Woodman looks dodgy because of O’Conner & Considine in front of him.