Originally Posted by
MAD_MAGPIE
A football club chairman is dammed if they do and dammed if they don’t. Who would be one?
If they improve the clubs facilities and infrastructure like what AH has done in the past year with the changing rooms, indoor pitch, banqueting suites etc...then if things are going well on the field everyone is happy. When things are not going so well on the pitch some people will bemoan and use these things as a stick for beating because they deem the playing budget more important.
The opposite of this is if the facilities and infrastructure are not modernised or improved and the team is doing well on the field nobody is that bothered and will be more inclined to tolerate some clubs having poor or crumbling facilities. If a big budget is put into the playing side and things don’t go well on the field then some fans bemoan players being a waste of money and if the budget for example is the best in the division then the team should be in 1st place.
For a chairman it is about having the right balance in investing in both the infrastructure and the playing side of the club. Both are important in their own right and both contribute to making the club what it is and affect the clubs status and valuation both in football and market valuation terms..
So I deem all the off field improvements AH has made and will be making good thing because it helps to improve the club overall.