All things are relative and in football terms these are relatively good.
All things are relative and in football terms these are relatively good.
It’s a far cry from Tony’s statement that ‘the club needs to stand on its own feet’.
Net worth now over minus £3m with loans that could be called in at any time and a stadium not owned by the club.
Find me a Football League club that stands on its own two feet for any length of time.
Yes theoretically ASD Lighting could call in it's loans, but what would be the point? Both the club and ASD are owned by the same person. What would he achieve by effectively using one of the companies to close the second down.
The ground is owned by RU Estates - a company owned by the same person as the club. Whatever the legal niceties, the ground and club are, in effect, owned by the same person.
The problem isn’t when he calls in his loans, it’s when he stops pumping money in.
Tony is now in his 70’s and at some point will want out. Any potential buyer of the club might not be happy with the lease terms. Then what??
As long as people stop slagging his son off on twitter