+ Visit Derby County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Derby to sue Rush for £6.8M

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6,799
    Quote Originally Posted by ramAnag View Post
    Suspect the ‘accountancy twins’ Roger and Manx may be in high demand on here over all this.
    How worried should we be chaps?
    Hard to say until accounts are available - and by that I don't mean the "commentary" press release by the club. Since we had accounts last year, informed opinion last year noted that we don't need to produce another set for 3 years, so it could be a while yet!

    As to the unfair dismissal claim which the club has lost, I wouldn't think that would influence the claim against SR. Since the dismissal was for alleged good cause - ie breach of fiduciary duty etc, then the normal procedures would have been ignored. Since correct processes may not have been followed, the club would naturally have lost at the tribunal? We need an HR view on that - where's Angry when you need him.

    The contingent asset recovery from the claim would only be a note and should not have been included in the balance sheet per se. The liabilities from which the contingent asset arose (eg enhanced salaries, transfer fees and agent payments) will have already been provided for or written off.

    So on the face of it the downside has already been dealt with and the upside should not have been included, but let's wait and see. I would imagine there is no FFP impact
    Last edited by roger_ramjet; 28-03-2018 at 09:23 AM.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,651
    RamAnag. Sorry about that bloody I phones Think you have to be cautious about anything the Mail writes they are saying Rush receive £2million for his unfair dismissal that is wrong since 2013 the most you can receive is £78,000 just checked with my solicitor I would imagine there is a lot we don't know about otherwise it wouldn't be going to the high court

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,423
    Just what we need, another disruptive side show to mess up our season.

    Non Rush players are going to be wondering how much the Rush players are getting.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    12,982
    Quote Originally Posted by mistaram View Post
    RamAnag. Sorry about that bloody I phones Think you have to be cautious about anything the Mail writes they are saying Rush receive £2million for his unfair dismissal that is wrong since 2013 the most you can receive is £78,000 just checked with my solicitor I would imagine there is a lot we don't know about otherwise it wouldn't be going to the high court
    Lol...I’m more than cautious about anything the Mail writes...totally agree, but something’s going on and, as Ram59 implies...it’s unlikely to be beneficial for the club...yet again!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    7,463
    Part of SR's £2M claim involves his, allegedly, owning 5% of the DCFC shares for which he hasn't been compensated......

    ....... I don't know if there's any truth in that....... Noor do I know if it has any connection to Nose Candie Crush

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6,799
    I recall that he had a 5% stake in the interregnum between the Appleton et al regime and Rush regime, and that this shareholding has disappeared, so it makes sense

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    8,359
    I think this is actually normal practise - former owners trying to eke as much as they can from current owners. Happens all the time. Heck even Fawaz is suing.
    It almost always ends in a deal of some sort and makes accountants and lawyers very happy people.
    Nothing to worry lads.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    4,716
    Quote Originally Posted by roger_ramjet View Post

    As to the unfair dismissal claim which the club has lost, I wouldn't think that would influence the claim against SR. Since the dismissal was for alleged good cause - ie breach of fiduciary duty etc, then the normal procedures would have been ignored. Since correct processes may not have been followed, the club would naturally have lost at the tribunal? We need an HR view on that - where's Angry when you need him.
    Yes, procedural unfairness is automatically deemed unfair dismissal, no matter how valid the dismissal reason might have been. Most employment lawyers would advise the individual to request reinstatement rather than compensation (as compensation can be only as much as statutory, not much for a high earner), and the employer would refuse and therefore have to pay increased compensation to severe the employment. No idea what happened in the DC v SR case of course, wouldn't want to speculate.

    Isn't the £6.8m about the cost of Butterfield? Sounds like we're seeking a refund to me!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    4,651
    Adi the actual figure is £6, 814,107,60 The 60p is Butterfield.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    20,648


    Trouble in paradise?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •