Originally Posted by oldcolner
Reply With Quote
The only people who seem to be around when there is an alleged chemical attack is the so-called White Helmets.They were set up by the same people as the Blackwater group in Iraq and are funded by the UK and America.That should tell you everything you need to know.The reason no other reporters are there is because our "moderate rebel” jihadist friends will take them hostage then cut their heads off or burn them alive.
Trump,referring to Russia and Iran`s support of Syria, said in his speech after the strikes that" why would any nation want to be associated with a country that murders innocent men,women and children”.We do not have any concrete evidence of that scenario but we do have concrete evidence of another country that has done exactly that in Yemen so in that case he better send some more ballistic missiles to rain down on Riyadh.I wont hold my breath.
We are being played like sheep.We learnt nothing from WMD in Iraq.The biggest gas reserves ever found are just south of Syria in Qatar and Assad has refused to allow a pipeline though his country because of his alliance with Russia.He,therefore has to be removed in the eyes of some and be replaced by a puppet ruler.It does not matter how many civilians get slaughtered in the meantime.
As for previous alleged chemical attacks even US weapon specialists do not believe the narrative from Washington.I quote:-
Theodore Postol, a national security specialist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, concluded that the White House claims were clearly bogus, writing:
“I*have reviewed the document carefully, and I believe it can be shown, without doubt, that the document*does not provide any evidence whatsoever that the US government has concrete knowledge that the*government of Syria was the source of the chemical attack in Khan Shaykhun, Syria at roughly 6 to 7 a.m.*on April 4, 2017.*
“In fact, a main piece of evidence that is cited in the document points to an attack that was executed by*individuals on the ground, not from an aircraft, on the morning of April 4.*This conclusion is based on an assumption made by the White House when it cited the source of the sarin*release and the photographs of that source.*My own assessment, is that the source was very likely*tampered with or staged, so no serious conclusion could be made from the photographs cited by the White*House.”]
