I find all of this talk about fizzy/PL players a bit of a joke. What makes a fizzy player and what makes a PL player? Itīs completely subjective, even if football was an individualsīgame and not a team game. You could say that PL players are better, technically, than Fizzy players but I wouldnīt classify Andy Carroll as a good, technical player but I would certainly classify him as PL quality striker when he played for us. Then again, when he went to Liverpool, I wouldnīt - how does that work, then?

Anyone who knows anything, knows that a team can perform to a greater than the sum of itīs individualsī talents or less than the sum and what decides a PL or Fizzy team can only be the results (wins and losses) that the team records. That, in turn, depends on how thoses players play together as a team, something hugely dependent on the manager/coach.