Message for some on here..

[Tut_Foster]

Many people don’t know this but it is possible to read something on the internet that you don’t agree with and simply move on with your life..

[pboromag]

Really

You mean you can just ignore it

Without calling for the author to be banned or thrown into jaiil

[ronandtet]

Many people don’t know this but it is possible to read something on the internet that you don’t agree with and simply move on with your life..

the problem is mate while we might see sometime on the bbc news we can skip it if we don,t want to read it however newcastle footymad is a forum for debate , now when a thread is started it is started as an opening opinion and others might want to give a differing opinion , heated debate is not a problem but a thread that turns nasty and on a personnal level is not done . We must also realise that persistant controversal threads are as bad in provoking others . fortunately at the moment we don,t seem to have any problems

[pboromag]

Yes the Mike Ashley threads get a bit tedious

So do the profit and loss of sports direct

But having a go at a manager who clearly makes mistakes weekly is seen as tedious

[Sclox]

Not "clearly" at all.

Finishing 10th on a shoestring and increasing the value of individual players shows me he gets it right more than he got it wrong. His aim is to improve the position of the team.

Uncle Mikes aim is to "get by" and increase the value of his bank balance. He also gets that very right too.

The correct question maybe should be "whose aim or vision is most in line with the fans?"It isn't uncle Mikes.

Now Pboro, here we go again. Dont ruin the current atmosphere with shiit stirring.

[ghostrider]

Not "clearly" at all.

Finishing 10th on a shoestring and increasing the value of individual players shows me he gets it right more than he got it wrong. His aim is to improve the position of the team.

Uncle Mikes aim is to "get by" and increase the value of his bank balance. He also gets that very right too.

The correct question maybe should be "whose aim or vision is most in line with the fans?"It isn't uncle Mikes.

Now Pboro, here we go again. Dont ruin the current atmosphere with shiit stirring.

This is the most annoying thing (in bold)
This is why the arguments happen because in one breath you slag off Ashley, because you know by mass opinion it's ok to do so and is not deemed as being an issue.
When someone has a pop at Rafa or whoever or whatever the majority feels is fine and dandy, it's classed as sheet stirring.
An easy way out and an easy way to create the actual sheet stirring you want to avoid, apparently.

[pboromag]

So if I post a thread after each game criticising his tactics or selection for that game or post an opinion that getting rid of Carr in my eyes is a mistake is **** stirring is it

So it's ok that he consistently played joselwho over mistertrick

Rafa did well to get us to 10th

But it could of and in my eyes should have been better
Sorry for thinking positive

And again stylox why use words like **** stirring if you don't want to start an argument

It only ruins the board ya kna

[Sclox]

This is the most annoying thing (in bold)
This is why the arguments happen because in one breath you slag off Ashley, because you know by mass opinion it's ok to do so and is not deemed as being an issue.
When someone has a pop at Rafa or whoever or whatever the majority feels is fine and dandy, it's classed as sheet stirring.
An easy way out and an easy way to create the actual sheet stirring you want to avoid, apparently.

Get your facts right. Who slagged Ashley? I didn't.

[ghostrider]

Get your facts right. Who slagged Ashley? I didn't.

Course you are. It doesn't mean you have to swear to slag him off but you're having a dig at him, which is fine but don't then start making out other people are stirring sheet when they disagree or have a go at Rafa.

Swings and roundabouts mate, so just deal with it like that and we'll all get along in some kind of non violent harmony.

[Sclox]

So if I post a thread after each game criticising his tactics or selection for that game or post an opinion that getting rid of Carr in my eyes is a mistake is **** stirring is it

So it's ok that he consistently played joselwho over mistertrick

Rafa did well to get us to 10th

But it could of and in my eyes should have been better
Sorry for thinking positive

And again stylox why use words like **** stirring if you don't want to start an argument

It only ruins the board ya kna

Ok. Slag Rafa all you want. No-one takes your Bo Selecta posts seriously anyway.

😂😂

Anyway, go back to the beach and stop talking on a footy message board and wasting your holiday.....if thats indeed where you are.

BTW, did you take Tanya's sage advice and try some vagina for a change yesterday?