WTF11 - Post 20 .............. Some queries to the above (in bold italics)
*As he has elsewhere ?
Elsewhere maybe had opportunities true BUT no time allowed and false promises would appear to have been the problem he gave when Radz & Kinnear asked the same question to him resulting in his obvious protracted negotiations.
Lille & Marseille appeared to breach contract was the gist of what he cannot say publically between the lines .......
*How, and to whos benefit ?
Success will benefit all (make my family happy football wise).Not too many owners actually make money investing in football but if they do then Good luck to 'em.I'm sure the city of Leeds could do with any extra revenue bigger crowds will bring in for starters ..........
If your allegedly having a dig at O*** then I don't know the terms & conditions of his contract but after a year at Leeds he'll have learned a lot and we'll all see if he conjures up what success requires ......
*Key word, "Successful", and any assessment of possible success is based on a set of criteria, which no-one appears willing to provide.
Success is how the individual sees it - Rad has publically told what he required when he bought the club and publically told what he'd do if he failed.
For me I'm always chasing targets so I'll require Leeds to do likewise ....... PL and shoot for the stars ..... why not !
*I wish that was our problem
....... many talented youngsters have left us which has been a problem but not all then blossomed so if they had stayed with us maybe they'd have failed likewise - who knows.
Never really sure if all these kids know what 'failure' is - for me sat on a bench week in would be personal failure but I'm not a sports team player,never was,I like the individual challenges so hey ho maybe I'm not the best person to comment on that scenario.
MOT