Paid in instalments......

[Zippity]

As said, it's all about making it look like we've got nowt so we spend nowt.

[tooslomofo]

So selling sissoko and Wijnaldum who were both on long contracts on nearly £100 k wages in total that money should show up straight away because it hasn’t been spent yet.
Every penny the club generates!!!!!
The lying fat sh1tehawk

[Zippity]

The lying fat sh1tehawk

Proven in court, no less.

[pboromag]

didnt the sheppards pay in installments and forget we still owed money we didnt have

you have to pay it some time

a bit like the credit crunch
its ok if the players you buy say in form

however if they get injured or just flop and need replacing
you need to buy more players in installments

fine if you havent stretched the finances by paying in installments

what happens if the team have a down turn and you get less money in than you forcast

the installments dont go down

would anyone buy us with the debt and a load of money owed in installments on players who can just run down their contracts and you get nowt from them

remeber
75% of our turnover is on wages alone

doesnt leave a lot of money for transfers however you pay it

[tooslomofo]

If we have paid wages upfront and those said players have left.
Where are the wages ?????????
No ones talking about hall and shepherd
Just fat man and missing money that we should have to go towards building a new squad
Are we not right to question where it is??
You can’t have it both ways

[Kingstonbob1]

didnt the sheppards pay in installments and forget we still owed money we didnt have

you have to pay it some time

a bit like the credit crunch
its ok if the players you buy say in form

however if they get injured or just flop and need replacing
you need to buy more players in installments

fine if you havent stretched the finances by paying in installments

what happens if the team have a down turn and you get less money in than you forcast

the installments dont go down

would anyone buy us with the debt and a load of money owed in installments on players who can just run down their contracts and you get nowt from them

remeber
75% of our turnover is on wages alone

doesnt leave a lot of money for transfers however you pay it

Ashley bought us with debt and instalments owing didn’t he? And has subsequently used it to whinge and use it as a stick to beat us with and because he didn’t do due diligence. Some feckn clues up businessman. Pfft

That’ll mean no one would ever buy Man Utd with their £750m debt or whatever the Glazers have it at?

[TheOtherTerryMac]

Out of our current first team squad only Dummet has come through the ranks with no transfer fee

The rest of the squad have all been bought under Ashley who stipulates that all transfers must include the players wages for the length of their respective contracts.

This is well documented in the press and from Ashley so that means that we must have the lowest outgoing wage bill of any Premier Club. To my knowledge no other Club factors wages into the fee. This is much the same with players that we have sold Sissoko Winjaldum, Townsend etc, etc

So where are these vast sums of money stored.

[ex_pat_magpie]

didnt the sheppards pay in installments and forget we still owed money we didnt have

you have to pay it some time

a bit like the credit crunch
its ok if the players you buy say in form

however if they get injured or just flop and need replacing
you need to buy more players in installments

fine if you havent stretched the finances by paying in installments

what happens if the team have a down turn and you get less money in than you forcast

the installments dont go down

would anyone buy us with the debt and a load of money owed in installments on players who can just run down their contracts and you get nowt from them

remeber
75% of our turnover is on wages alone

doesnt leave a lot of money for transfers however you pay it

Where do you get the fairy tale of 75%.

https://www.nufc.co.uk/news/latest-news/annual-accounts

It is under 60%

[Geordie1974]

Where do you get the fairy tale of 75%.

https://www.nufc.co.uk/news/latest-news/annual-accounts

It is under 60%

Beat me to it there.More made up numbers from P/Boro.So on that score,with hardly any net spend on players can anyone tell me legally how the fake loan for the supposed debt goes up.We are running at a massive profit.Not a loss.
Also it is 11 yrs since tubby walked through the doors.So we will not owe anyone for any transfers.So no P/Boro there should be plenty of money available for transfers,as long as the money stays in the club that is.