Reply With QuoteUsed to think he was decentOriginally Posted by bulmer1889
Not so sure now
32/33 Years young I think
I'm not a big fan of bringing in too many 30+ years old players
Experience is one thing, but we have 3 x 30+ year old strikers already
Hall Of Fame
Training with us atm by the looks of things don't know if it's to prove his fitness or just to keep fit
Hall Of Fame
Used to think he was decent
Not so sure now
32/33 Years young I think
I'm not a big fan of bringing in too many 30+ years old players
Experience is one thing, but we have 3 x 30+ year old strikers already
Hall Of Fame
Great player till he did his knee, but was a shadow of himself after recovery, and his half yard of pace was gone.
Does he play deeper now?
Hall Of Fame
He was a decent player for us back in the day. Had a terrible game in the play off final against Burnley.
Saw him play a couple of times on the telly last season and I still think he has something to offer. His pace will no doubt have dwindled but maybe he's improved his game to compensate.
Hall Of Fame
might go same route with him as we have with mcgoldrick 1 year deal perhaps
Hall Of Fame
I thought he played in a more wider position these days.
Maybe he is only here to keep his fitness up (as previously stated) but I'd like to us to bring in a younger striker for development.
New Member
Why would we even consider him? Nathan Thomas who we have sent out on loan is a far far better player than Jamie Ward these days.
Hall Of Fame
true Woody - but maybe like Woodburn - Thomas isn't considered ready for a top end Championship club yet
Posting Permissions