+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 6 of 32 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 312

Thread: Andrew Considine - Please Just Get Tae ƒuck

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacman1903 View Post
    Shinnie losing the ball was terrible play. It was mentioned at the time. McKenna was also flat footed
    It was a poor throw in to Shinnie in the first place.
    I think is one of Devlin / McKenna had stayed with the ball / striker instead of both going to the goal line it could have been overted.
    Poor start, but we came back well despite that dissapointment

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,844
    Quote Originally Posted by RedStarTorphins View Post
    As much as I’m no Considine fan, to blame him for the goal is showing a lack of understanding of the game.
    Jack Cork ran from midfield & wasn’t tracked.
    He had the run on Considine.
    It was good midfield play by a good player & a good move from a team who have more quality in the final third.
    That’s what £60m gets you compared to £200k.
    Totally agree RST.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    401
    I thought considine did better than I expected too. I'm no expert, but don't see how he could be expected to mark 2 players at once.

    I was more surprised by logan. His performance was a lot worse than I'm used to.

    There will always be a fans scapegoat. If considine goes, someone else will get it

  4. #54
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    30,497
    Quote Originally Posted by kb_don View Post
    I thought considine did better than I expected too. I'm no expert, but don't see how he could be expected to mark 2 players at once.

    I was more surprised by logan. His performance was a lot worse than I'm used to.

    There will always be a fans scapegoat. If considine goes, someone else will get it
    Not about the marking. Yes it wasnt his man but at times in football you need to cover your mates. He was in a better position than anyone to win that ball. He could have headered it over the f@cking stand if he wanted but he managed to not venture toward it and jumped 3cm upwards when it was already too late. He could have and should have been first to it as the balls flight was toward him but he didnt go to it as he was ballwatching

    I realise it wasnt his fault he was in that position but he didnt have the savvy to deal with it when he clearly could have. It was very poor defending.

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    7,844
    Quote Originally Posted by Pacman1903 View Post
    Not about the marking. Yes it wasnt his man but at times in football you need to cover your mates. He was in a better position than anyone to win that ball. He could have headered it over the f@cking stand if he wanted but he managed to not venture toward it and jumped 3cm upwards when it was already too late. He could have and should have been first to it as the balls flight was toward him but he didnt go to it as he was ballwatching

    I realise it wasnt his fault he was in that position but he didnt have the savvy to deal with it when he clearly could have. It was very poor defending.
    Yes, he maybe could have done better covering the third man , but it was in extra time in his first game back.
    Think he was knackered as much of the team were by that point.

    No real need to blame him in the circumstances when there were others that could have done more as well.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    2,112
    Feel bad about posting as this just bumps this ridiculous fuucking thread to the top.

    As I've said before, you c0cks that come on to just take cheap shots at Condisine really need to have a word with yourselves and just get tae fuuuck yourselves.

    OK, we lost, but to single out Andy Considine because you cuunts are too lazy to be critical of anyone else is just daft... peasants!

  7. #57
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    30,497
    Quote Originally Posted by Landvetter83 View Post
    Feel bad about posting as this just bumps this ridiculous fuucking thread to the top.

    As I've said before, you c0cks that come on to just take cheap shots at Condisine really need to have a word with yourselves and just get tae fuuuck yourselves.

    OK, we lost, but to single out Andy Considine because you cuunts are too lazy to be critical of anyone else is just daft... peasants!
    Its not singling him oot. Shinnie was murder at the first and the defence will see it and think "fuuuuuuuuu@ck" McKenna was flat footed Lewis wasnt great. But it was basic defending that Considine didnt do.

    As i said before. We didnt concede a good goal yet we conceded 4

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    2,959
    Totally agree. Far too often Considine gets pelters when others are more culpable but escape the same vitriol.
    All I read on this site before the home leg was how Lennon was going to rip Considine a new arsehole blah blah blah. What happened last night? After doing zip in the first half he was punted to the other wing.
    Any explanation for that those that posted?
    I would prefer a better LB than Considine but he'sdone a decent job for us over the years and doesn't deserve the vitriol he gats on here.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,331
    Nobody has formed an opinion on Considine on the back of last nights game. We all know what he can & cant do, as does the rest of the league.

    I like him, seems to love his job but he’s never been good enough.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    1,213
    Its fvcking pathetic that the usual suspects couldn't wait to get stuck into their favourite scapegoat.

    Why isn't there a thread highlighting McKenna's errors which cost us 2 goals over both games ?

Page 6 of 32 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •