+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 65

Thread: OT-Ben Stokes

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    9,180
    Quote Originally Posted by Airborn Pie View Post
    Where do I say I believe it and that I've made my mind up? Read my words again 'if you believe this account'..........................

    If the jury go for this account, the boy's in trouble, affray can carry a hefty sentence. It's more serious than assault and easier to prove and if they accept the elements of homophobia, the judge will hammer him.
    It’s the case for the prosecution. It’s their job to present the incident in the worst possible way for Stokes. No one should be “believing anything” until they’ve heard both the prosecution and the defence case.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,002
    Quote Originally Posted by BigFatPie View Post
    It’s the case for the prosecution. It’s their job to present the incident in the worst possible way for Stokes. No one should be “believing anything” until they’ve heard both the prosecution and the defence case.
    Maybe so, but the people who believed Stokes was defending two gay men who were being picked on look a bit foolish now. Also, Stokes would be well advised not to give a death stare to photographers he is passing on the way to court. See picture in linked article.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-45097840

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohinen View Post
    Maybe so, but the people who believed Stokes was defending two gay men who were being picked on look a bit foolish now. Also, Stokes would be well advised not to give a death stare to photographers he is passing on the way to court. See picture in linked article.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-45097840
    The only reason people believed it is because that is what the media were saying at the time and who is to say that version isn't correct !

    We can all draw our own conclusions after those two have spoken and Stokes himself.

    I noticed yesterday the one out of the armed forces didn't want to press charges you can see why now after the CCTV yesterday shows all 3 of them in a bad light and not just the "celeb".

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    4,632
    Affray is affray. The images are damning for all concerned and for me, regardless of how the lawyers dress it up, they are all guilty of the actual offence of affray.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    3,051
    Quote Originally Posted by Notts78 View Post
    Affray is affray. The images are damning for all concerned and for me, regardless of how the lawyers dress it up, they are all guilty of the actual offence of affray.
    Agreed

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,323
    Quote Originally Posted by Notts78 View Post
    Affray is affray. The images are damning for all concerned and for me, regardless of how the lawyers dress it up, they are all guilty of the actual offence of affray.
    He's been accused of 'fake mincing' in front of two gay blokes.
    If one of them is 'of colour' the Cricket Hooligan has a Full House.
    When/if he comes out of prison he'll look like that weather vane at Lords.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    996
    Quote Originally Posted by dam617 View Post
    He's been accused of 'fake mincing' in front of two gay blokes.
    If one of them is 'of colour' the Cricket Hooligan has a Full House.
    When/if he comes out of prison he'll look like that weather vane at Lords.
    They also showed the vid where he flicked a cig end at someone's head, it was very clear.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,323
    Quote Originally Posted by Airborn Pie View Post
    They also showed the vid where he flicked a cig end at someone's head, it was very clear.
    Probably not the first time he's had a butt thrust at his face.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    11,887
    Quote Originally Posted by Notts78 View Post
    Affray is affray. The images are damning for all concerned and for me, regardless of how the lawyers dress it up, they are all guilty of the actual offence of affray.
    One of them has been acquitted.

    What did you base your decision on?

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    3,969
    Quote Originally Posted by dam617 View Post
    Probably not the first time he's had a butt thrust at his face.
    If wit was tit, you wouldn't need a bra.

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •