“Only Adding Quality That Improves Us”

[RealisticBlade]

Is McGoldrick better than sharp?
Is Woodburn better than Brooks?
Is Henderson better than Moore?
Is Egan better than Stearman?
Is Bryan better than Stevens?

Just last week Wilder hailed a terrific transfer window. Am I missing something?
Is our team any better than this time last year?

[herbert]

Listen, we tried but...... wages.

[shorehamoldboy]

do you think we might be back in for gallagher on loan herbie if he doesnt get sold today ? surely we could afford 50 per cent of his salary

[FatherKnowsBest]

Is McGoldrick better than sharp?
Is Woodburn better than Brooks?
Is Henderson better than Moore?
Is Egan better than Stearman?
Is Bryan better than Stevens?

Just last week Wilder hailed a terrific transfer window. Am I missing something?
Is our team any better than this time last year?

In sequence.

Not really, but they offer something different
Yes
Possibly
Yes
Well, according to the know-alls, Stevens should be at Skegness giving rides to children, so yes.

[CHIPBUTTYBLADE]

Whats the other word Wilder uses when doing transfer business,the word means the player has future value.huh ive forgot,do you know ?

Beacuse of all the transfer dealings he has done i only see a two/three that would bring in a decent wedge of £.

Loans dont count,and players already here dont count,before he came.

[woodysrightfoot]

We are told in Chris we trust as a Blade wil always but why persist in going for midfielders then not giving them a proper chance apart from his 2 favorites he should have kept and played holmes and lenard until coutts fully fit the blend the midfield from then

[GrayBlade]

in sequence.

Not really, but they offer something different
yes
possibly
yes
well, according to the know-alls, stevens should be at skegness giving rides to children, so yes.

looool! that made me laugh

[FatherKnowsBest]

Actually, now I think about it.

McGoldrick doesn't replace Billy, He replaces Hanson and Lavery. See how that works..? We've moved out players who were just 'back-ups' and replaced them with a deeper squad of first team standard players. No-one is pretending this is perfect, but we are stronger as a squad. We sure need to show it on the pitch.

[Carpe_diem]

Actually, now I think about it.

McGoldrick doesn't replace Billy, He replaces Hanson and Lavery. See how that works..? We've moved out players who were just 'back-ups' and replaced them with a deeper squad of first team standard players. No-one is pretending this is perfect, but we are stronger as a squad. We sure need to show it on the pitch.

Whichever way you dress it up, moving two players out and replacing with one player does not give us a deeper squad.

[rodcurrie]

Whats the other word Wilder uses when doing transfer business,the word means the player has future value.huh ive forgot,do you know ?

Beacuse of all the transfer dealings he has done i only see a two/three that would bring in a decent wedge of £.

Loans dont count,and players already here dont count,before he came.

Yes let's get shut of our Chris and bring back Davy boy or Madkins Agnes eh? I mean our Chris has done a dreadful job at BDBL hasn't he? D'ya not think we'll mek a quid or two when JOC and FLECKY move on? UTCB