+ Visit Blackburn Rovers FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 61

Thread: Rovers return for Brererton

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,680
    Quote Originally Posted by AucklandRover View Post
    I know you don't like Mowbray to be questioned, but would you pay 8M for a relatively inexperienced 19-year-old? The market has gone mad.

    Do you think we over-paid for Armstrong Auks?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,680
    Quote Originally Posted by AucklandRover View Post
    I know you don't like Mowbray to be questioned, but would you pay 8M for a relatively inexperienced 19-year-old? The market has gone mad.

    If you are looking for negatives I'd question why? If I'm being very honest


    I get you've had your fingers burnt once or twice. We all have. But that's just football.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,680
    All I'm doing is repeating what the club has. And Mowbray. I'd say since he came in, hes eaent therigjt not to have every decision he has made questioned. When there isn't even anything wrong? It's clearly working. Anyone can see that.

    But folk need to be negative. I looked at the predictions for Carlisle in the week. Everyone backing them. We won 5-1. But let's be honest, it's still not good enough though is it? You all said we'd lose. We won 5-1. And I'm the mad guy for pointing these things out.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,297
    I predicted Rovers to win. You are being a bit melodramatic in making yourself out to be TM's only ally.
    Armstrong is a totally different case. We already knew what he could do.
    I have been one of Mowbray's strongest supporters, but i refuse to say he cannot do anything wrong.
    You haven't answered the question: 8M??

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,680
    Quote Originally Posted by AucklandRover View Post
    I predicted Rovers to win. You are being a bit melodramatic in making yourself out to be TM's only ally.
    Armstrong is a totally different case. We already knew what he could do.
    I have been one of Mowbray's strongest supporters, but i refuse to say he cannot do anything wrong.
    You haven't answered the question: 8M??
    £8m for a lad who is highly rated. And 19, and an international. In today's market. Yes.100%.

    Leeds spent £10m on Bamford.
    Stoke spent £10 on Ince.

    Yes, I think it's a fair amount to pay.


    I'll ask you again, as you didn't answer. Did you think we over-paid for Armstrong.

    I am not this lad man you claim I am. If I see something that u don't agree with, I say. I was critical of things on opening day. Which we discussed at length. I often state I don't get why Travis doesn't get more game time.

    I'm just not going to sit and be really negative about loads of things, I don't believe are negative.

    The amount of negatives,in comparison to the positives brought up are not balanced. Or even. You'd think we where in a really bad place listening to all of this. This reality is, we aren't. I'm just getting behind the boss, and the club.


    Far too many experts saying how they would do things differently. Unhelpful and most redundant.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    4,323
    Going on to the Carlisle game
    I don't think anybody predicted such a strong 11 to be fielded so in all fairness the negativity leading up to the game was with a weakened line up.
    If we knew mowbrays intentions then maybe the predictions would of been more upbeat
    Of course had we knew the line up I am sure Carlisle would of been more prepared.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,680
    Quote Originally Posted by robinrover View Post
    Going on to the Carlisle game
    I don't think anybody predicted such a strong 11 to be fielded so in all fairness the negativity leading up to the game was with a weakened line up.
    If we knew mowbrays intentions then maybe the predictions would of been more upbeat
    Of course had we knew the line up I am sure Carlisle would of been more prepared.
    All I'm saying is, maybe Mowbray has earnt the right to not be questioned before a ball is kicked? Back to the default setting for most is negative. Even before the game.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    11,680
    I just want to add to all this.
    We have returned with a much higher offer.
    Venkys have just turned over record profits, they trust Mowbray (with good reason) and are willing to back him 100%.
    £8m to them is nothing.
    If think he's worth it, then we'll get him. .

    Just as importantly as strengtheing us. Crucially it sends out a message to the rest of the league that we aren't here to make up the numbers. Results will also show them that.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,297
    Quote Originally Posted by champs95 View Post
    £8m for a lad who is highly rated. And 19, and an international. In today's market. Yes.100%.

    Leeds spent £10m on Bamford.
    Stoke spent £10 on Ince.

    Yes, I think it's a fair amount to pay.


    I'll ask you again, as you didn't answer. Did you think we over-paid for Armstrong.

    I am not this lad man you claim I am. If I see something that u don't agree with, I say. I was critical of things on opening day. Which we discussed at length. I often state I don't get why Travis doesn't get more game time.

    I'm just not going to sit and be really negative about loads of things, I don't believe are negative.

    The amount of negatives,in comparison to the positives brought up are not balanced. Or even. You'd think we where in a really bad place listening to all of this. This reality is, we aren't. I'm just getting behind the boss, and the club.


    Far too many experts saying how they would do things differently. Unhelpful and most redundant.
    I DID answer about Armstrong. I said he was a known package - so well worth it.
    Apparently, Forest are asking 12M and will probably be settle for 9-10M. To me, that is a huge gamble. If he comes in, I will support him, as I do every Rovers player, but I cannot get this business of you saying no-one has a right to have a different opinion from Mowbray, and that - if they do - they are not proper supporters. Apart from a centre-forward to cover the ageing Graham, I still maintain that we have more than ample cover in the creative/attacking areas. Who will be dropped from the group of Graham, Armstrong, Dack, Palmer, Rothwell, Bennett, etc. to accommodate a still unproven 19-year-old? TM still has reservations about Travis because of his inexperience, so is it likely another ****ager would walk into the team?
    We already know what we would get from Gallagher. I'd much prefer that certainty.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    6,297
    Incidentally, Champs - nearly all the negativity is still focused on Mowbray's ability as a manager (although some of the worst culprits have gone quiet!) That's not what I am talking about. He has been very impressive in that respect. In addition, his open, honest relationship with the supporters is just about the best I've seen.
    I still reserve the right to say that there comes a point where adequate cover becomes redundancy when a squad gets beyond a certain size, and that's when players start to get restless. Our best youngsters could see a path forward last year. If we bring in four or five signings (including a 19-year-old). that pathway is effectively blocked.

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •