+ Visit Aberdeen FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 17 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 165

Thread: Murrayfield or Hampden?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    3,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    Looks like they’ll bring in standing areas behind both goals WHEN they stay at Hampden.
    FTFY.

    Absolutely no chance the Strathclyde Fitba Assiciation would move from the weeg. As someone said it’s all just a ruse to get the ground off of Queens Park for a song.

    Hampden is a sh’itehole. Only reason for safe standing behind both goals is to pander to the cheeks as usual as it can’t be seen for one to get something the other doesn’t get - feckin Groundhog Day continues and it’s our and the other diddy clubs fault.

    Terrible ground, terrible view and terrible location. Compare it to what the likes of Wales and Ireland have and it’s a feckin embarrassment.

    But it’s the “traditional” home (yawn - most of what’s wrong up here is the constant refusal to change anything) and it’s in the weeg so that’s it.

    We and the diddies will be getting dragged down there for s’hite kickoff times for years yet I’m afraid...,

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    12,430
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Moog View Post
    FTFY.

    Absolutely no chance the Strathclyde Fitba Assiciation would move from the weeg. As someone said it’s all just a ruse to get the ground off of Queens Park for a song.

    Hampden is a sh’itehole. Only reason for safe standing behind both goals is to pander to the cheeks as usual as it can’t be seen for one to get something the other doesn’t get - feckin Groundhog Day continues and it’s our and the other diddy clubs fault.

    Terrible ground, terrible view and terrible location. Compare it to what the likes of Wales and Ireland have and it’s a feckin embarrassment.

    But it’s the “traditional” home (yawn - most of what’s wrong up here is the constant refusal to change anything) and it’s in the weeg so that’s it.

    We and the diddies will be getting dragged down there for s’hite kickoff times for years yet I’m afraid...,
    ****e kick off times could be sorted by our own club.

    What difference would it make travelling from Aberdeen to murrayfield compared to Hampden?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,329
    You’re blaming the SFA & weegies for things that Aberdeen FC allow to happen. There’s options open to us & we don’t use them. If anything, we encourage it.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    21,494
    It's the perfect scenario for everyone who hankers after out of town new stadia to get their own way.

    Build the thing somewhere close to the motorway around Perth.

    Enough room outside to raise a tented village before each game played.
    Food, drink, films of your own fitba team winning.

    Masses of parking.....Magic.

    Two tier so that only the bottom tier can be open for Kilmarnock v Partick Thistle semi finals.

    Make it compact enough to ensure atmosphere, don't divide the crowd on sectarian terms and we have a winner.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,329
    Bumped for the decision being made today.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Mason89 View Post
    Bumped for the decision being announced today.
    FIFY


    Those T0$$ers made up their collective mind ages ago!

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32,329
    Hope so. It’s the easiest decision the SFA will have to make but they’ve got previous.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    1,991
    Quote Originally Posted by donsdaft View Post
    It's the perfect scenario for everyone who hankers after out of town new stadia to get their own way.

    Build the thing somewhere close to the motorway around Perth.

    Enough room outside to raise a tented village before each game played.
    Food, drink, films of your own fitba team winning.

    Masses of parking.....Magic.

    Two tier so that only the bottom tier can be open for Kilmarnock v Partick Thistle semi finals.

    Make it compact enough to ensure atmosphere, don't divide the crowd on sectarian terms and we have a winner.
    In an ideal world, that ticks all the boxes, sadly we are stuck in a world that is far from ideal.......in this case it is between 2 grounds.......I would genuinely prefer Murrayfield for cup finals and big internationals and give the rest of the grounds(license permitting) to host all smaller internationals/semis.

    SF

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    14,682
    Hamdung is a sh1tehole - terrible views from behind the goal.

    Murrayfield is little or no better though.

    However, some of the reasons weegie based journalists are giving for remaining at Hamdung are laughable.
    Things like how inconvenient it would be for 67,000 "Rangers" & Celtic fans to go to Edinburgh etc.

    I have no real preference for either as behind the goals at both stadiums is very poor

    Murrayfield holds 67,000 as opposed to Hamdung's 50,000 maybe swings it for me.

    I'd rather it was either one of them though as opposed to the suggested option of alternating between the Brendanbeau or the B@stard Garden.
    I'd not set foot in either to give those c***s any more money than I have to.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,727
    The national stadium should be in Perth. Somewhere most Scottish football fans can get to with relative ease.

    On the other hand, would you want 60,000 unwashed descending on your town when it's the cup semi or final? Maybe just keep it at Hampden...

Page 3 of 17 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •