Ben Purrington

[Romared]

Oakwell bound then !!!

[Ronners]

Purrington is a better defender than Mattock.

That's a matter of opinion, and for me he's nowhere near as good as mattock at the moment, and for whatever reason Paul Warne thinks so too. However the lad has got bags of potential and hopefully will make our LB position his own in the next couple of years. UTM

[nakedtruth]

That's a matter of opinion, and for me he's nowhere near as good as mattock at the moment, and for whatever reason Paul Warne thinks so too. However the lad has got bags of potential and hopefully will make our LB position his own in the next couple of years. UTM

Mattock is a bit more adventurous than Purrington so slightly better at going forward.

If it was just about defending Purrington would be the best choice.

Warne likes his team to have a high tempo style, Purrington is more of a “calm it down” type defender.

Plus neither Warne nor Barker know much about defending.

[Pattylallacks2]

Mattock is a bit more adventurous than Purrington so slightly better at going forward.

If it was just about defending Purrington would be the best choice.

Warne likes his team to have a high tempo style, Purrington is more of a “calm it down” type defender.

Plus neither Warne nor Barker know much about defending.

John Breckin does though

[nakedtruth]

John Breckin does though

Which is why he’s been relegated to party planner

[animallittle3]

Mattock is a bit more adventurous than Purrington so slightly better at going forward.

If it was just about defending Purrington would be the best choice.

Warne likes his team to have a high tempo style, Purrington is more of a “calm it down” type defender.

Plus neither Warne nor Barker know much about defending.

I don't think your lad Purrington crossed the half way line to be honest , that said about 8 other Wimbledon players didn't either .

Be interesting to see what he can do offensively in a home game where the emphasis is on Wimbledon to be more positive .