+ Visit Notts. County FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 89

Thread: Now do the sums. What it's cost us and what could have been

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    6,121
    Quote Originally Posted by americanpie View Post
    I often sit here, at my computer, and wonder how Ray Trew is filling his time these days.

    Reading our message board.

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    11,002
    Quote Originally Posted by JoePass View Post
    Reading our message board.
    Or writing on it.

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    13,059
    Quote Originally Posted by matt_magpie View Post
    There's no proof Kewell cost 400k, it was just reported correctly or not that's what they were after, I imagine we paid 100k tops.
    If Leigh Curtis reported £400k it must be true. That's as watertight as a proof of funds letter from a London merchant bank.

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    983
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohinen View Post
    Or writing on it.
    Can't make up my mind:which one.

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,850
    Quote Originally Posted by Elite_Pie View Post
    Alan sometimes talks bullsh!t, but I found that article honest and reassuring.
    I've just caught up with this thread and good heavens there's been some rubbish posted. I've chosen to respond to EP because of his comment about AH and in the article linked by Gumpy AH states "In reality, football clubs are no different from any other business, but there is this perception they are different entities that have to work in their own special way." Well how much bullsh!t is that? They are totally different to almost every other type of business. How many league clubs actually turn in break-even or better? Even AH in his earlier days states that the club will lose £1m-£1.5m/year. Or put another way, owners of football clubs have the most expensive season ticket.

    The club is funded by loans made by Paragon. We are not in a position to know what the terms of these loans are but offsetting losses from one entity (here NCFC) by loans from a profitable entity (Paragon) just makes business sense. It reduces Paragon's corporation tax liability for a start. Those that would have AH pay the money in directly do not appreciate that if AH took that extra money out of Paragon in the form of salary there would be National Insurance and Tax to pay, and also Dividend tax if he took the money out that way. It makes business sense to do it the way he is. It doesn't make business sense to donate money (usually in the form of increasing shareholding) beyond the minimum required to meet any FFP rules etc. Should Notts ever start trading at a profit then those tax from those profits would immediately be offset by the losses. And if the club is sold (ah ah) the negotiations would be about the amount of that debt, if any, that would be paid off or written off. Otherwise the money and the interest will never be expected to be paid off by NCFC - that is not the purpose loaning the money.

    I don't know the situation regarding shareholders at Paragon except that the company is generally accepted as being AH's so he is the major shareholder. If he owns more than 50% then what he says goes. If Paragon were to call in the debt then Notts would be back to square one as occurred when RT declined to fund it any further. Paragon would get nothing if the club went into administration because anything tangible would be swallowed up by HMRC and the Administrators, there would be nothing left.

    Regarding an earlier comment about AH not being able to afford the Ladies that was not the case. The situation was quite clear at the time - he bought NCFC as a job lot which included the Ladies. He had hoped that other funds would be available in the form of grants etc to help keep the team going and that didn't happen. He was not prepared to afford the Ladies. They were RT's vanity venture and with all that was needed at NCFC they were an expensive distraction.
    Clearly AH is a successful businessman but like RT he stumbled on that success. That is a very different animal to trying to become a success with an existing venture. AH clearly loves grass roots football and also the idea of being a football owner. Often said on here is that he was a Notts County supporter but I don't believe that to be the case other than being a supporter of local clubs. I know when he changed the Lifeline rules he said he hadn't known of its existence beforehand. Most supporters surely know of Lifeline.
    He has shown little acumen in running club successfully. Obviously he's improved things he has control over but one of the biggest downfalls is over ambition. I've made my views clear on the dangers of "5 year plans" and that he should never have had the Championship aim. It leads to premature disappointment and panic as it did with RT. No owner has control over what the competing clubs are up to. All he can do is set the foundations with sensible management recruitment and player recruitment decisions and try to build (not rebuild every year) a squad that can perform. Why we have to have the next Eddie Howe is unrealistic. Maybe we can bring an assistant manager through the ranks but all that is needed is plain boring and steady.
    It is madly and sadly disappointing that we've got to where we've got to and you have to pray (and we shouldn't be in that position) that an unproven Australian is going to be the answer.
    Maybe the DOF will make a difference but I tell you what worries me and that is AH's statement that he's looking forward to learning from Paul Hart. Is that a sign that AH is prepared to interfere in footballing matters. He needs to take a step back.
    So we are in a position where we need AH and he appears to be committed. He can afford it providing he stops making mistakes and re-evaluates his ambitions to a more realistic level. Success will come when it comes but steady progress comes from getting things right and base level and not aiming blindly for the stars. If he tries the latter he'll end up, as are signs already, disillusioned, and we'll have another managerial merry-go-round and a disinterested owner. At this stage there are more similarities than differences between RT and AH.
    For me he needs to step back, stop being star-struck and be more hard-nosed and calculating like a real businessman before his passion burns out with disappointment.
    E&EO, apologies for any typos. COYP.
    Last edited by Old_pie; 10-09-2018 at 05:23 PM. Reason: Remove double "quote"

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    6,237
    I'll tell Alan Hardy and Harry Kewell something now, if the glaring inadequacies in defence are not addressed IMMEDIATELY - and I don't mean shuffling the pack - they can expect a considerable drop in attendancies from non-season ticket holders. Few regulars will put up with the absolute and incompetent rubbish they have witnessed so far.

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    1,493
    Quote Originally Posted by BigFatPie View Post
    Is the sort of thing you write after taking monkey dust?
    I got bored after the 1st sentence

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    1,465
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohinen View Post
    Or writing on it.
    Probably rotting away somewhere...with his god awful other half

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Posts
    1,465
    Quote Originally Posted by michelinnotts View Post
    Just because a supporter wants to look at the big picture I must have a motive?

    My motive is not to have my boy in tears and my old dad who I sit in the Pavis with every week unsure of whether the club will survive in following weeks again as was the case various times before. My lad isn't old enough to have seen financial collapse and uncertainty prior to what he saw in the sunset weeks of Trews era, but I don't really want him to experience Gillingham away again soon. As for Dad, he has seen it all and I don't think it is unreasonable to point out the faults in our business plan or risk our ownership presents.

    I'm not even anti AH, we need him to stay doing what he is doing for as long as possible. I've just pointed out a number of facts and reasons why our stability and position as a club isn't much different to when AH took over and that our future is effectively solely in his control as long as he can afford to put cash in monthly, or the control of Paragon PLC and it's shareholders, or a new owner if one could be found if AH can no longer afford it, and that people who say " it's his money he can spend it how he wants" are in my opinion wrong to take that view. Every pound Alan Hardy allocates to our clubs DEBT, is another pound of risk.
    You are obviously ITK Michel. Are you an ex employee? If you are you will know a lot more than you are revealing. I believe our club is in a dire situation and has been for some time despite what AH puts out on social media, reality is starting to bite.

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    7,850
    Quote Originally Posted by McCullochisGod View Post
    You are obviously ITK Michel. Are you an ex employee? If you are you will know a lot more than you are revealing. I believe our club is in a dire situation and has been for some time despite what AH puts out on social media, reality is starting to bite.
    On what basis do you believe the club is in a dire situation? What is starting to bite?

Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •