I do. He hasn't spent a penny on a proven striker and Washington only has a deal till the summer...
I do. He hasn't spent a penny on a proven striker and Washington only has a deal till the summer...
I'm sure Tufty&The staff will have their list ready but havin your list ready and gerrin players to actually sign or completely different are they not? For what it's worth i agree we do need another striker in January but for nar i'm just gunna enjoy our play.UTCB
yeah me too but im not certain chris does think he sees woodburn as another striker from the bench plus is cheds loan up in january or has it been extended ? might still think he could do a job
Yes.
Good strikers are essential
We have decent strikers, but none of them will be able to do it for a full season.
It should be the number one priority to get at least one proven goal getter in, but it has to be one that can play within our system and not just get a striker in because he's ok and he's available.
Early days but imo CW hasn't yet solved the striker issue
3 strikers in their 30's
1 striker who hasn't proved himself in the Championship to date
As decent a technical player McG is, I don't think he is the answer to the problem and very early days for Washington, but I have my doubts about his goal scoring prowess at this level
I hope I'm wrong of course
Dunt agree re;the 3 strikers bein similar Longy,Billy's a box player,Goldie's a link player and George is a runner.It's gunna cost alot to get someone anywhere near as good as FLECKY i just hope we dunt sell him in't January,i aint heard we may but it would be disastrous for our season if we did.UTCB