Originally Posted by
tarquinbeech
Strange how you state that 0s and 10s should be reserved for "drama queens", yet include someone's 10 in your calculation so as to drive home your point!
Both Charlie and Stall commented that the saves were clearly ones that "any competent player should make at this level"....I'm delighted for the lad, and scored him slightly better than the mathematical average of 5. I also marked all the Notts players in a tight range of 4 to 5.5, for an average Notts performance achieving a 0-0 draw at an unfancied team's ground.
If people want to invoke the "sympathy vote" and give Fitz 7s and 8s, sobeit....it's a Match Ratings thread based on Personal Opinion of those that watched the game, after all.
I will attempt to give my ratings on the next match, I suggest that anyone who disagrees with my ratings analogy simply ignores them....or compares the highs and lows across the team (as I do) and reads the comments only.
Reading the Ratings this way, shows most thought that Hewey had little to no impact coming on, midfield was solid but lacked incisive passing, Hemmings runs tirelessly, Stead was solid once again, Turley is a no-nonsense Hulk...etc etc......the only "difference" we seem to have is that I thought Fitz had a much-improved, but competent performance, whilst others see him as the new Gordon Banks (hyperbole)!