+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 65

Thread: 40 weeks of nightmare Royal Baby news...

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    7,981
    "............We need to win the next General Election and get rid of these blood sucking Tory scumbags. And we will."

    Roll on, higher unemployment, small businesses closing down etc., however, all will be well because the Welfare System will have more and more money thrown at it and will be quite sustainable because the socialists will be happy to bring in a system of 100% Inheritance Tax for all for non-Labour supporters and Royalty, who remain apolitical.

    All politicians are looking for Utopia, particularly for themselves and *******s to the rest of us. I do love the reference to a manifesto --surely these consist of promises which are made but are hardly ever put into practice except for one in the Tory maniffesto of Cameron relating to a vote on the EU ----just look at the mess that that has created, however, the people were given a choice as stated in the manifesto and although we are over two years down the line nobody in the general public has a clue as to what is happening or is likely to happen. Why? They were misled by politicians pontificating and promising things which a person with a glass eye could see would not be possible to achieve.
    Never mind. there will be plenty of career politicians coming through the ranks of Oxbridge to continue the decline of our nation,

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    22,021
    "a Labour government will legislate across the board to reform the labour market to ensure there’s a safety net put under working conditions which have been savagely undermined by an exploitative Tory employment paradigm."


    There you go again BT, more virtue-signalling drivel. A report from Dame Laura Cox came out this week, she had been asked to investigate the alleged bullying and ***ual harassment of House of Commons staff, in other words, their working conditions The BBC report that...


    "Dame Laura, a former high court judge, found "a culture, cascading from the top down, of deference, subservience, acquiescence and silence, in which bullying, harassment and ***ual harassment have been able to thrive and have long been tolerated and concealed".

    "She heard from 200 people about a place overwhelmed with culture of deference where victims feel guilty for their victimhood.
    MPs are a major part of the problem; she wrote: "Some MPs were alleged to be "serial offenders" and there was said to be widespread and long-standing awareness internally of their behaviour. It is not possible to put a precise figure on the number of MPs who are alleged to have behaved in this way, but the accounts indicate that alleged bullying behaviour has been a more widespread problem than one limited to a few individuals. And, while some of the allegations relate to the past, others reveal that it continues to be a problem."


    "The new grievance processes should allow old claims to be reopened. At the moment, old cases cannot be raised under the House's new improved complaints process. This would permit investigation of John Bercow, Speaker of the House, who is accused of mistreating two of his private secretaries and would also re-open cases like those of Paul Farrelly, a Labour MP, who was the subject of an old process that Dame Laura regarded as insufficient."


    The man directly responsible for this shameful culture of abuse is the Speaker of the House, John Bercow. There have been calls for him to resign, but of course he's keeping his head down and staying put, despite one MP bringing up the case of her constituent at PMQs, and asking what is going to be done about the abuse she has suffered working under Bercow. Nothing is going to be done about Bercow, because Labour MPs flatly refuse to move against him, they want to keep him in place because they believe he will be on their side in the upcoming Brexit debates. So political expediency is more important to Labour than the working conditions of ordinary people, they can suffer abuse at work, as long as the abuser is on Labour's side, that's OK.

    The hypocrisy just keeps on coming, in the last few days we've hypocrisy on inherited wealth, private school education, zero hours contracts, worker's rights, plus denigration of people who have died for their country, and there's the ongoing anti-Semitism problem. I would dearly love to help you get this dangerous bunch of halfwits out of office BT, but anyone who thinks that a bunch of virtue signalling, lefty hypocrites is going to do anything but make the country a bigger shambles than it already is, has got to have had their brains addled.
    Last edited by sinkov; 18-10-2018 at 09:23 AM.

  3. #43
    The last two posts have just been moderated and thrown in the bin.

    We need a radical sea change and a Labour Government will bring it about. The days of neo-liberalism and privatisation wrecking our pay packets and economy are fast coming to an end. For the many not the few.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    22,021
    Quote Originally Posted by The Bedlington Terrier View Post
    The last two posts have just been moderated and thrown in the bin.

    We need a radical sea change and a Labour Government will bring it about. The days of neo-liberalism and privatisation wrecking our pay packets and economy are fast coming to an end. For the many not the few.

    Off you go on one again BT, out in the real world this was on the BBC website two days ago.


    "Wages excluding bonuses have risen at their fastest pace in nearly 10 years, official figures show.

    Pay rose by 3.1% in the three months to August, compared with a year ago, while inflation for the same period was 2.5%.

    Last week, Bank of England chief economist Andy Haldane said he saw signs of a "new dawn" for wage growth.

    The latest official data also showed unemployment fell by 47,000 to 1.36 million in the three months to August. The jobless rate remained at 4%.

    David Freeman, the Office for National Statistic's (ONS) head of labour market, said: "People's regular monthly wage packets grew at their strongest rate in almost a decade."

    "The number of people in work remained at a near-record high, while the unemployment rate was at its lowest since the mid-1970s."


    Wages rising at their fastest rate in ten years, unemployment at it's lowest for more than 40 years, and you want a radical sea change ? Is this just more lefty drivel BT, or do you actually want wages to fall and unemployment to rise ?

  5. #45
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Posts
    7,305
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    Off you go on one again BT, out in the real world this was on the BBC website two days ago.


    "Wages excluding bonuses have risen at their fastest pace in nearly 10 years, official figures show.

    Pay rose by 3.1% in the three months to August,
    yet....in July, it was reported that: UK wage growth slides to lowest rate in six months

    "Workers unable to demand higher pay despite lowest unemployment since 1970s
    https://www.theguardian.com/business...y-unemployment

    ...so wages grew - and that makes perfect sense...being there's less workers hunting for jobs, but that August report of a 3.1% rise, was in comparison to the same time a year earlier....but growth rate has seemingly still slowed up - perhaps because, theres those other months for it to do so - I guess.

    it's all doubletalk and spin....is why I can be rarely bothered to bother.


  6. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    Off you go on one again BT, out in the real world this was on the BBC website two days ago.


    "Wages excluding bonuses have risen at their fastest pace in nearly 10 years, official figures show.

    Pay rose by 3.1% in the three months to August, compared with a year ago, while inflation for the same period was 2.5%.

    Last week, Bank of England chief economist Andy Haldane said he saw signs of a "new dawn" for wage growth.

    The latest official data also showed unemployment fell by 47,000 to 1.36 million in the three months to August. The jobless rate remained at 4%.

    David Freeman, the Office for National Statistic's (ONS) head of labour market, said: "People's regular monthly wage packets grew at their strongest rate in almost a decade."

    "The number of people in work remained at a near-record high, while the unemployment rate was at its lowest since the mid-1970s."


    Wages rising at their fastest rate in ten years, unemployment at it's lowest for more than 40 years, and you want a radical sea change ? Is this just more lefty drivel BT, or do you actually want wages to fall and unemployment to rise ?
    Whose wages rose? Not the millions of poor souls on zero hour contracts. Not the disabled who have been deemed fit to work despite only having one wheel on their wheelchair. Leave your Ribble Valley Bubble sinkov and get in the real world.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    22,021
    "Not the millions of poor souls on zero hour contracts."


    Yes you've got to feel for the poor souls haven't you BT, the mugs thinking Labour are on their side.

    "Jeremy Corbyn was accused of “rank hypocrisy” as it emerged the stewards manning the Labour Party Conference were on zero hours contracts".

    "Welsh Labour councils employ 1000s on Zero Hours contracts – despite Corbyn pledges."

    Thousands of Welsh workers are being hired on zero hours contracts by Labour councils, despite firm pledges made by the UK Labour leadership. Figures for 2016/17 (the latest full financial year) show that Swansea Council employed 492 members of staff on such contracts in the year leading up to the last council elections – up from 467 in 2014/15. Meanwhile at Labour-run Bridgend Council, 283 members of staff were employed on zero hours contracts, down from 328 the year before. Other Labour-run council administrations disguised some of their employees under the guise of ‘casual staff’ – a category of worker almost identical to those on zero-hours contracts, with no guaranteed weekly hours. Cardiff (876) and Rhondda Cynon Taf (1044) employed casual workers in large numbers during 2016/17, whilst there was a steep increase in the number of staff with casual agreements at Caerphilly Council – from 190 in 2015/16 to 286 in 2016/17.

    “Despite hysterical virtue signalling by their Leaders on the issue of zero hours contracts, it seems that the practice is alive and well at Labour and Plaid run councils. Jeremy Corbyn and Leanne Wood regularly promise to scrap zero hours contracts and yet their councils are more than happy to employ thousands on them. It’s rank hypocrisy from politicians who care more about perception than putting their ideas into practice."

    "This morning’s Mirror reports that there are 151 people currently employed by MPs on zero-hour contracts – including 62 hired by Labour MPs."

    "Nearly 70 Labour MPs have been accused of using controversial zero-hours contracts despite Ed Miliband's election pledge to severely limit their use. Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls, Lucy Powell, Labour’s elections chief and Karen Buck, Ed Miliband’s parliamentary aide are alleged to use the employment agreements. The Sun has reported that 68 Labour MPs are affected - nearly a quarter of the Parliamentary party."

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    22,021
    As usual BT you seem a bit confused, nothing unusual for a lefty, but perhaps you could clarify....

    "I see no glory in death, or fighting for an imperialist cause and going over the top as cannon fodder for the benefit of the ruling class."

    "I wear my poppy with pride, not to kowtow to our Royal family or our country, but to honour every single person who has given their life so that I can live mine."

    So what was it were they were dying for, couldn't have been both, the benefit of the ruling class, or to give us the freedom to live ours ? Make your mind up.

  9. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    As usual BT you seem a bit confused, nothing unusual for a lefty, but perhaps you could clarify....

    "I see no glory in death, or fighting for an imperialist cause and going over the top as cannon fodder for the benefit of the ruling class."

    "I wear my poppy with pride, not to kowtow to our Royal family or our country, but to honour every single person who has given their life so that I can live mine."

    So what was it were they were dying for, couldn't have been both, the benefit of the ruling class, or to give us the freedom to live ours ? Make your mind up.
    Fairly easy one for me to answer is this sinkov. It is hard not to still feel an intense sort of rage at the incompetence and cruelty of a governing class that put brave and resolute soldiers through hell in their mechanisation and normalisation of war.

    In Russia, the grotesque slaughter perpetrated in World War 1 was probably the primal cause of the great revolution of 1917, sadly not repeated here in Britain.

    The legacy they fought and died for, here...

    Attachment 10924

    Attachment 10925

  10. #50
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    Off you go on one again BT, out in the real world this was on the BBC website two days ago.


    "Wages excluding bonuses have risen at their fastest pace in nearly 10 years, official figures show.

    Pay rose by 3.1% in the three months to August, compared with a year ago, while inflation for the same period was 2.5%.

    Last week, Bank of England chief economist Andy Haldane said he saw signs of a "new dawn" for wage growth.

    The latest official data also showed unemployment fell by 47,000 to 1.36 million in the three months to August. The jobless rate remained at 4%.

    David Freeman, the Office for National Statistic's (ONS) head of labour market, said: "People's regular monthly wage packets grew at their strongest rate in almost a decade."

    "The number of people in work remained at a near-record high, while the unemployment rate was at its lowest since the mid-1970s."


    Wages rising at their fastest rate in ten years, unemployment at it's lowest for more than 40 years, and you want a radical sea change ? Is this just more lefty drivel BT, or do you actually want wages to fall and unemployment to rise ?
    For the few not the many eh sinkov..?

    https://www.theguardian.com/inequali...CMP=GTUK_email

    I see Jimmy Rich Bollox is taking his wealth to Monaco?

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •