+ Visit Burnley FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 65

Thread: 40 weeks of nightmare Royal Baby news...

  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Altobelli View Post
    I take it we are all agreed that the lass has been around the block many times.
    So had his mother, Harry is used to women of doubtful virtue. Who's his dad again..?


    Attachment 10912

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    12,744
    If I want to know the latest goss on the Royal Family I just check on here.

    There seems to be a fixation about them with you lot!

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    21,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Altobelli View Post
    Now now Mr Sinkov, I also have better things to worry about, but it is a message board and you seem to have carped on this thread more than myself
    I don't think so Alto, one or two slightly tongue in cheek observations, but I don't carp about tthe Royal Family, they don't really impinge upon my life, and it just amuses me the way some people foam at the mouth about them. If I can wind them up I will, all good fun.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    7,961
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    I don't think so Alto, one or two slightly tongue in cheek observations, but I don't carp about tthe Royal Family, they don't really impinge upon my life, and it just amuses me the way some people foam at the mouth about them. If I can wind them up I will, all good fun.
    You are lucky, sinkov, they used to impinge on my life quite a lot in my 23 years service in the RAF!

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    21,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Supersub6 View Post
    You are lucky, sinkov, they used to impinge on my life quite a lot in my 23 years service in the RAF!
    You surely can't complain Sub, they kept you in a bloody good job for 23 years. If you had a tenner for every time you've played God Save the Queen, would you be rich ?

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    7,961
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    You surely can't complain Sub, they kept you in a bloody good job for 23 years. If you had a tenner for every time you've played God Save the Queen, would you be rich ?
    Oh yes!! Add The Dambusters, 633 Squadron and anything by Glenn Miller and I would be rivalling BT for wealth!

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    21,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Supersub6 View Post
    Oh yes!! Add The Dambusters, 633 Squadron and anything by Glenn Miller and I would be rivalling BT for wealth!
    Aye, you could be a Champagne Socialist as well Sub, just like the Bedlington (I don't want to be a Tory, I just want to live like one) Terrier.

  8. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by sinkov View Post
    Aye, you could be a Champagne Socialist as well Sub, just like the Bedlington (I don't want to be a Tory, I just want to live like one) Terrier.
    In a nutshell this is what you don't get sinkov. We all want the same opportunities from birth. I could be retired, but I continue to work to accumulate untold wealth. I ain't done too badly for a lad from a working class background and a secondary school education. Thanks to Harold Wilson I was able to get a Honours degree with the Open University.

    Proper wages. No zero hour contracts. A fair day's pay for a fair day's graft is all us socialists ask. Why the phuck should this shower of shoite be born into such ostentatious wealth and privilege?

    Attachment 10915

    Attachment 10916

    I never want our lot to end up like this lot, but I wish they would all just sail off into the sunset with their obscene wealth and let us all get on with it...


    Attachment 10917

    r

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    21,946
    "Proper wages. No zero hour contracts. A fair day's pay for a fair day's graft is all us socialists ask."

    Well you won't get it from the Labour Party BT. Just more do as I say, not as I do, loony left hypocrisy. We've had it this week on inheritance and private schools, which you lefties want to ban for everyone else, but are quite keen on for themselves, now it's zero hours contracts.

    "Jeremy Corbyn was accused of “rank hypocrisy” as it emerged the stewards manning the Labour Party Conference were on zero hours contracts".

    "Welsh Labour councils employ 1000s on Zero Hours contracts – despite Corbyn pledges."

    Thousands of Welsh workers are being hired on zero hours contracts by Labour councils, despite firm pledges made by the UK Labour leadership. Figures for 2016/17 (the latest full financial year) show that Swansea Council employed 492 members of staff on such contracts in the year leading up to the last council elections – up from 467 in 2014/15. Meanwhile at Labour-run Bridgend Council, 283 members of staff were employed on zero hours contracts, down from 328 the year before. Other Labour-run council administrations disguised some of their employees under the guise of ‘casual staff’ – a category of worker almost identical to those on zero-hours contracts, with no guaranteed weekly hours. Cardiff (876) and Rhondda Cynon Taf (1044) employed casual workers in large numbers during 2016/17, whilst there was a steep increase in the number of staff with casual agreements at Caerphilly Council – from 190 in 2015/16 to 286 in 2016/17.

    “Despite hysterical virtue signalling by their Leaders on the issue of zero hours contracts, it seems that the practice is alive and well at Labour and Plaid run councils. Jeremy Corbyn and Leanne Wood regularly promise to scrap zero hours contracts and yet their councils are more than happy to employ thousands on them. It’s rank hypocrisy from politicians who care more about perception than putting their ideas into practice."


    "This morning’s Mirror reports that there are 151 people currently employed by MPs on zero-hour contracts – including 62 hired by Labour MPs."

    "Nearly 70 Labour MPs have been accused of using controversial zero-hours contracts despite Ed Miliband's election pledge to severely limit their use. Shadow Chancellor Ed Balls, Lucy Powell, Labour’s elections chief and Karen Buck, Ed Miliband’s parliamentary aide are alleged to use the employment agreements. The Sun has reported that 68 Labour MPs are affected - nearly a quarter of the Parliamentary party."

    You will understand BT, given the above, why I've long ago come to the conclusion that you lefties are a bunch of two-faced, hypocritical, sanctimonious, virtue-signalling w@nkers. Or you just have bad memories.

  10. #40
    You live in the Ribble Valley Bubble sinkov, like the rest of the good folk of the Tory voting rural community, you are so detached from reality it's really quite scary.

    Ten years of Tory austerity and exploitative employment laws cannot be changed at the flick of a switch. The Tories have inspired an explosion of insecure employment and zero-hours contracts.

    I can tell you the Labour Party are radically opposed to that, and in our manifesto we made clear that a Labour government will legislate across the board to reform the labour market to ensure there’s a safety net put under working conditions which have been savagely undermined by an exploitative Tory employment paradigm.

    We need to win the next General Election and get rid of these blood sucking Tory scumbags. And we will.


    Attachment 10922

Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •