I'd like to think so but i doubt it.
Seems like ash is taking his debt back I mean his loan .He has took 10 million in the summer and plans on taking an estimated 23 million before the season ends .Is this so he can attract a buyer ?
I'd like to think so but i doubt it.
It's his warped way of continuing to screw us over.He says we owe him even though he takes a fortune out of us.
It's his way of saying I was doing well by the club with the fake loan,now you are all protesting against me,my dummy is on the floor and I will show you how bad I can make it by taking money and showing you just how much.
He is making it public as he knows it will p1ss everyone of to see it.
As for takeover not a chance in my book.Even if we were for sale it's his clauses and add one after he eventually goes that will stop any sale.
We will only be attractive to a buyer once we´ve been relegated and the fat c*nt is forced to sell the club for a cheaper price. In the meantime he will asset strip by selling the players and invest nothing in the squad or facilities to screw as much money out as possible.
Meanwhile the majority of supportes look on neutrally - f*ckin wake up.
Did an accountant come out and tell the media that Ashley took 10 million out and is also going to take 23 million more?
Anyone know where this came from?
the players take their wages why shouldnt ash take some of his loan back
the banks would
and look at it this way the more he takes back now the less the new owners will have to pay
makes sence to me
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...dge-back-rafa/
nufc refused to deny it
There are also many cases where people refuse to comment for fear of being taken out of context.
By my logic I expect to see both sides to a story and any side to the story has to be backed up with clear facts or it leaves itself open to speculation just as we all do on a daily basis with the past and present shenanigans/running of Newcastle United.
And yes, they aren't guilty or innocent of anything until one side of the story is confirmed.
Is it confirmed as fact? Because mass opinion does not guarantee facts.