Again, I'm not being confrontational in opposition. You might be right but what evidence can you point me to that backs up this viewpoint? I accept that cheap imported labour is a problem and we must address it when it happens, but what evidence that it in itself causes these huge problems with unemployment on this scale?
Yes,you can also throw in other Eurozone countries such as Macron's France where youth unemployment is far higher than it should be.Paris ,at present is not a very nice place to visit with all the protesting and don't forget Greece, where the figure is alarming.This is not fake news, like we hear from the big cats' project fear.We never hear this on the BBC,I wonder why.
Just read a Reuters article that says "Spain was the biggest beneficiary of the EU's Youth Guarantee scheme, which EU leaders agreed on in 2013 and which was initially backed by 6.4 billion euros in funds to get young people into work."
Im guessing the EU did more than given credit. May of the article want you want.
https://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUKKCN1BV0GU
Bill, this is largely bonkers. I hear this all the time on the BBC. And your idea of "big cats" pedalling "project fear" is quaint but absurd. And what do you mean by the statement that youth unemployment in France is far higher than it should be? This implies that there is some pre-ordained level of youth unemployment which exists independently of cyclical, structural and cultural factors. There have been many studies of this problem and many of the "solutions" run exactly counter to the demands of the yellow vest movement. If you want to blame all this on the EU (or like Exile on Romanians flooding into Spain and Portugal) that's your business but I doubt if your remedy of us following our own "rules" will prove the panacea you think.
I see that Labour are whipping their MPs in the indicative votes.
Where does that do for the legitimacy of the process when a significant number of MPs are being told which options to support?