+ Visit Rotherham United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14

Thread: Should A.rsenal's 3rd goal stood?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,022
    As I've already said the fact that a goal was allowed in exactly the same circumstances does not create a precedent. There are thousands of examples of goals being incorrectly allowed or disallowed in the past - that doesn't create a rule for the future.

    You rely on the strict literal meaning of "hands" to mean both hands not one or both hands. I can see why you might think that. However, that is obviously not correct. Part of the same law is :

    "An indirect free kick is awarded if a goalkeeper, inside their penalty area, commits any of the following offences:
    controls the ball with the hands for more than six seconds before releasing it
    touches the ball with the hands after:
    releasing it and before it has touched another player
    it has been deliberately kicked to the goalkeeper by a team-mate
    receiving it directly from a throw-in taken by a team-mate"

    Would you argue that it is ok for the keeper to handle the ball after releasing it, or receiving a back pass etc. if he only uses one hand?

    law 12 http://www.thefa.com/football-rules-...and-misconduct

    Yes I've seen what happened.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    12,387
    "ball between hands and a surface". Isn't aubomingham (spell check having a hissy) head a surface?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    7,022
    NB (wtf?)
    Law 12 2015-2016:

    "Indirect free kick
    An indirect free kick is awarded to the opposing team if a goalkeeper, inside his
    own penalty area, commits any of the following four offences:
    • controls the ball with his hands for more than six seconds before releasing
    it from his possession
    • touches the ball again with his hands after he has released it from his
    possession and before it has touched another player
    • touches the ball with his hands after it has been deliberately kicked to him
    by a team-mate
    • touches the ball with his hands after he has received it directly from a
    throw-in taken by a team-mate
    An indirect free kick is also awarded to the opposing team if, in the opinion of
    the referee, a player:
    • plays in a dangerous manner
    • impedes the progress of an opponent
    • prevents the goalkeeper from releasing the ball from his hands
    • commits any other offence, not previously mentioned in Law 12, for which
    play is stopped to caution or send off a player
    The indirect free kick is taken from the place where the offence occurred"

    The law has changed

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    35,285
    We know the law has changed, but even the officials don’t know them now

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •