Purrington is back...

[Shark27]

When we don't have enough players to fill the bench why is it a good idea to send him back out on loan?

[flourbasher]

Maybe He's a high earner due to his £400k price tag so PW,s wheeling and dealing

[mikemiller]

Maybe He's a high earner due to his £400k price tag so PW,s wheeling and dealing

Could be something to do with cutting the wage bill... never really sure about exactly how skint we are, but transfer (in)activity might be a clue...

[Brin]

Can't see him playing for us again now. Think his contract expires this summer. What did we pay for him? £400k? Not bad for about a dozen appearances! And people wonder why Tony is reluctant to open his wallet!

Not one of Warne’s finest moments when you look at it like that. Then again didn’t the recruitment team suggest signing him?

[CAMiller]

18 months left on his contract so plenty of time for him to continue improving and show a profit on our investment.

[gkotw]

Just a thought, and I have no inside information nor want to set any hares racing, but maybe there are appearance clauses in his contract. If we don't really rate him as a player, why run the risk of having to pay him and/or plymouth additional money. It could be part of any loan arrangement that the other clubs meet the clause demands.

As I said, it's just a thought.

[dmentor]

When we don't have enough players to fill the bench why is it a good idea to send him back out on loan?

Beggar's doesn't it,threadbare squad,and we are sending players out on loan,when we are desperate for bodies,that could help out from the bench,at least.

[Eth_ask]

I suppose the thing is with Ben is he is only 22 with a lot of time to improve if a top end league one team want him now then next year or even season after would only be the same age as most of our signings