In a democracy people are allowed to alter their opinion. Nobody was up in arms when May called the 2017 General Election two years after the 2015 General Election saying the people ev already given their view and they shouldn't be asked again two years later.
Azza further thought on Jules post tha cuddev
A) Duz tha wish to remain? Tick Box A
B Duz tha wish to leave? Tick Box B. If thaz ticked Box B duz tha want 1 May's Deal ? Tick Box 1 or 2 No Deal ? Tick Box 2
If Leave won Parliament would know what fooaks wo thinking
I often wonder whether the person that opened this can of worms in the first place did have the best interests of a nation at heart rather than personal vanity?
That would be dojy Dave.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_6PcPVkP-RY
Last edited by upthecolliers; 18-01-2019 at 02:19 PM.
I won't say who I'm on about for fear of reprisal Colliers. This person challenges everything through court and has the police watching what is said about them.
Apparently the government tried to implement brexit without going through parliament. Wasn't the referendum voted on by parliament in the first place?
So the government tried to implement something that was already agreed. Hence a load of unnecessary hoo hah ensued because someone didn't like being on the losing side of a referendum.
An earlier contributor claimed that the disparity in wealth in different areas of the UK was caused by the EU. This is not correct of course the UK government decides where to invest in the UK. For example London receives £i200 per head of the population for transport infrastructure from central government while South Yorkshire is granted £250 per head of population. It is also the case London Transport was not forced to privatise the system like every other authority was instructed to do so. Thats why London has an excellent bus service while our system is a disgrace.