Agree, felt like a witch hunt for Kewell because he wasn't media friendly. I have supported Hardy and to some point still do but it was him that raised it to the board apparently there was something going wrong with Kewell. Think he sighted players didn't understand his instructions, well I do believe that as they are struggling following simple setplay instructions now. Not sure what would have happened under Kewell, can't argue that under him we saw the best performances and results. I do believe Ardley can do a job but with the results required now we basically need the form of a promotion pushing team, so the only answer is we need at least another 4 or 5 top quality players and things to go our way.
Apparently so.
He gives that impression for sure and I was surprised we went for him and when we paid compo for him I thought we'd give him more time.
As fans do we really care what the manager is like if they get results ? I mean look at Steve Evans not exactly liked by anyone but i'd take him over Ardley in a heatbeat.
want to stay in non league hell for a while, then?
cox does not get them playing pretty football, but he does get them at least fighting and trying to win.
you wouldnt want him in the league, i agree, but in the bananarama conference he can, with a half decent budget, (which for the first season you would have) get you promoted.
or you could do a cheaterfield and employ club "legends" like jack lester, or even go for mad dog allen, and hover around the trapdoor to another relegation.
It's unfortunate that people had their noses put out of joint, but right now, I would take unhappy staff and a few more wins, which is what Kewell gave us. We can now face obscurity knowing we have a nice manager in Neal Ardley. Maybe the managers Hardy interviewed and wrote off as 'bloody awful' would have been a better bet.