+ Visit Newcastle United FC Mad for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Poor standards in the Premiership of biased decisions by officials on/off the fiefd

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    15,651
    Quote Originally Posted by waalsendmick View Post
    Much as it angered us, not everybody thought their equaliser was a foul....


    So VAR may well have allowed the goal.
    In that case, Mick, I wouldn’t have a problem.
    Refs have a tough job so why not make it easier for them and make the game fairer at the same time?

    For me it was stone wall....

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    15,651
    Quote Originally Posted by Ragatino View Post
    Even a blind man can see this was a foul.




    Rugby Union is the perfect example of how VAR should work. The game is as fast as football and the interruptions are appreciated by the crowd who enjoy the spectacle and cheer the decisions. No one can argue with the out come as they are clear, obvious and honest.

    I don't think the referees will be 'found out' per say as mentioned about. It's more a case that you have men in their 40s & 50s who are slower than the game is now played at. If you run your legs off chasing the pace of the prem at that age your heart rate is up, you are hyper ventilating and your decision making is impaired.

    Much the the special forces training - they put their recruits through hell to see how the react under pressure when exhausted and fatigued. Having a ref in the stands providing a 2nd pair of eyes to the ref on the pitch is great support. It doesn't detract from the game or diminish the man on the pitches' authority rather it reinforces it as they players can't get away with the 'unsportsmanlike behaviour' - in other words cheating to us normal honest human beings.

    Dives, time wasting, fouls, off the ball incidents etc would all be resolved quickly & yes each decision should be displayed on the big screens to show the crowd exactly what happened and why the decision was made. Also this would shame players into acting in a more gentlemanly manner - something which footballers are seldom accused of.

    They brought in the shaving foam to mark 10 yrds for free kicks and it has been a great success. VAR done the right way will also improve the game, that I don't doubt.

    What I would also like to see is pay-related-fines. If a player is on £200k a week then they should be fined £400k for cheating.

    With punishments matching the players salary you would soon see a dramatic change in the way the game is played.

    Will it happen? Not likely - Much like the criminality surrounding player Agents, fees, dodgy dealings etc. These issues won't go away but as more money is pumped into the sport as US media companies like Amazon Prime, Google's whatever & Netflix start to eye live sporting events these issues will simple be more exasperated than see any resolution.

    Arron 'Sick note' Ramsey 400k a week - ridiculous - the lad isn't worth half a Waddles' Bo!!ok!
    Since VAR came into rugby and reviews came into cricket it’s clear to see how many games used to be decided on poor umpire/ref decisions. Multi million pound football is living in the dark ages still.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    25,042
    Quote Originally Posted by toptoon View Post
    Since VAR came into rugby and reviews came into cricket it’s clear to see how many games used to be decided on poor umpire/ref decisions. Multi million pound football is living in the dark ages still.
    You are right on the ball there and when you consider the amount of money in football compared with other major sports it is criminal that the game is in the dark ages still. It must be suiting some one or some group who wants to leave it as it is.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    8,345
    Quote Originally Posted by toptoon View Post
    In that case, Mick, I wouldn’t have a problem.
    Refs have a tough job so why not make it easier for them and make the game fairer at the same time?

    For me it was stone wall....
    I agree with you 100% but plenty pundits, ex refs and Twitter "experts" claim otherwise.

    99.9% of the time that goal is disallowed. 0.1% of the time it is scored against us, then it is given.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Forum Info

Footymad Forums offer you the chance to interact and discuss all things football with fellow fans from around the world, and share your views on footballing issues from the latest, breaking transfer rumours to the state of the game at international level and everything in between.

Whether your team is battling it out for the Premier League title or struggling for League survival, there's a forum for you!

Gooners, Mackems, Tractor Boys - you're all welcome, please just remember to respect the opinions of others.

Click here for a full list of the hundreds of forums available to you

The forums are free to join, although you must play fair and abide by the rules explained here, otherwise your ability to post may be temporarily or permanently revoked.

So what are you waiting for? Register now and join the debate!

(these forums are not actively moderated, so if you wish to report any comment made by another member please report it.)



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •