Originally Posted by
ncfcog
Could you put that question in the same category as; Should a habitual *****phile be allowed to work with children if he/she promises not to do it again?
FWIW I agree with most of the responses, you make your bed and you lie in it, however, there is also a human element to consider here. When she left she was still essentially a child. You could say she was vulnerable and therefore easy to radicalise. You could say there is an argument that she has already suffered the consequences of this having been exposed to the realities of a life many of us will never be exposed to and therefore there might be hope for her yet given the right support.
I've just seen that Security Minister Ben Wallace has stated she has 'rights' and should be allowed to return. I'm sorry, but not at mine or the tax payers expense or at the expense of our own national security.