O/T: Please please let me come home

[navypie]

If she does come 'home', not seeing heads tossed in bins on a daily basis could severely traumatize her. Well, we have to think of her well being.

[i961pie]

Why should the Bangladeshi’s consider her as “one of their own” when she’s never been there but not the UK when she was born and brought up here?

The Irish football selectors consider any one who has drank a pint of Guinness as one of their own, ask Tony Cascarino.

[navypie]

Why should the Bangladeshi’s consider her as “one of their own” when she’s never been there but not the UK when she was born and brought up here?

Why don't you run some kinda 'bring the scumbag home ' campaign? Let's face it, you're well qualified.

[centenarypie]

Perhaps we should let her back in and hopefully she will take the same walk in Oxfordshire that Dr David Kelly took when he "committed suicide" over the WMD scandal ?

[irishpete]

Let the bitch rot,& all the daft b@stards that feel sorry for her ,go & join her, if it really bothers them.Her family should be shipped out to her,not getting legal aid.Far cheaper a few seats on a plane.
Funny how she wasn't wanting to come home when the first baby was born,when Isis had a stronghold

[navypie]

Let the bitch rot,& all the daft b@stards that feel sorry for her ,go & join her, if it really bothers them.Her family should be shipped out to her,not getting legal aid.Far cheaper a few seats on a plane.
Funny how she wasn't wanting to come home when the first baby was born,when Isis had a stronghold

Here here, especially if that means we can get rid of fat boy

[Old_pie]

Why should the Bangladeshi’s consider her as “one of their own” when she’s never been there but not the UK when she was born and brought up here?

They make their laws and their laws say that she is automatically a citizen by descent. Read their THE CITIZENSHIP ACT, 1951. The don't have to "consider her as one of their own", she just is regardless of where she was born and where she was brought up.

Which means that the UK is not making her stateless by withdrawing her UK citizenship and is not breaking any international conventions.

What Bangladesh then do is up to them but as of now it seems as if Bangladesh is her only state, and they don't want terrorists, but they will have to take those steps according to their laws and international conventions.

[sidders]

To so many saddoes on this fred, here's some valuable advice for those who heed it.
HATE is a wasted emotion.

[LaxtonLad]

They make their laws and their laws say that she is automatically a citizen by descent. Read their THE CITIZENSHIP ACT, 1951. The don't have to "consider her as one of their own", she just is regardless of where she was born and where she was brought up.

Which means that the UK is not making her stateless by withdrawing her UK citizenship and is not breaking any international conventions.

What Bangladesh then do is up to them but as of now it seems as if Bangladesh is her only state, and they don't want terrorists, but they will have to take those steps according to their laws and international conventions.

If Bangladesh simply refuse to let her in physically, what will the International Courts or whoever do? What CAN they do? They certainly won't persevere with Bangladesh, a dead end there, but these courts, knowing how soft Britain is, will find some obscure law that states she must go to her last safe place of residence - guess where that will be, in their opinion?

This case will be a severe test of the government's resolve. In the face of The EU's bullying tactics over Brexit we have to show the world some guts somewhere.

[LaxtonLad]

To so many saddoes on this fred, here's some valuable advice for those who heed it.
HATE is a wasted emotion.

That's not "valuable advice", it's an aphorism.