o/T I thought BBC news was supposed to be objective?

[the_idiotb_stardson]

Soppy lefty Liberals, who present the show wetting themselves about the people's vote petition.

Wake me up when it reaches 17.5 million.

[ragingpup]

Soppy lefty Liberals, who present the show wetting themselves about the people's vote petition.

Wake me up when it reaches 17.5 million.

The BBC is most certainly biased: https://www.rt.com/uk/431477-bbc-bias-corbyn-author/

[KerrAvon]

The BBC is most certainly biased: https://www.rt.com/uk/431477-bbc-bias-corbyn-author/

So you are relying upon an article published on Russia Today - funded by Putin's government - and based upon a report by a 'key Corbyn ally'... Good grief.

You will risk your mental health if you keep smoking that stuff.

And aren't you supposed to be out on the knocker for Labour today to keep you away from the Remainer march?

[ragingpup]

So you are relying upon an article published on Russia Today - funded by Putin's government - and based upon a report by a 'key Corbyn ally'... Good grief.

You will risk your mental health if you keep smoking that stuff.

And aren't you supposed to be out on the knocker for Labour today to keep you away from the Remainer march?

My lovely little stalker!

What of the facts put forward in the article do you dispute specifically? Feel free to counter argue the facts put forward in there, if you can.

[KerrAvon]

My lovely little stalker!

What of the facts put forward in the article do you dispute specifically? Feel free to counter argue the facts put forward in there, if you can.

Stalker? Is that what I'm going to get for responding to your posts?

You put up a link to an article on Russia Today and based upon a report by a 'key Corbyn' ally. What 'facts' are you talking about?

Is Russia Today where you get your stuff from generally? It explains a lot.

[Exiletyke]

[QUOTE=KerrAvon;39178288]Stalker? Is that what I'm going to get for responding to your posts?

IRONY coupled with HYPOCRACY

[harpo88]

It’s had the most signatures of any petition on the Government website. Regardless of anything else, objectively that is somewhat significant. You have not heard anyone on the BBC saying that there is a large majority for revoking article 50 in the country.

[the_idiotb_stardson]

It’s had the most signatures of any petition on the Government website. Regardless of anything else, objectively that is somewhat significant. You have not heard anyone on the BBC saying that there is a large majority for revoking article 50 in the country.

Apparently, Rasputin, Gandhi and Shrek have all signed the petition.

[bogsdollox]

It’s had the most signatures of any petition on the Government website. Regardless of anything else, objectively that is somewhat significant. You have not heard anyone on the BBC saying that there is a large majority for revoking article 50 in the country.

Neither are they reporting on the yellow vest riots which have been going on every weekend for 12 weeks now.

[ragingpup]

Stalker? Is that what I'm going to get for responding to your posts?

You put up a link to an article on Russia Today and based upon a report by a 'key Corbyn' ally. What 'facts' are you talking about?

Is Russia Today where you get your stuff from generally? It explains a lot.

The 'facts' are the disproportionate number of right wing guests on BBC political programmes compared to left wing. Are you struggling to find them?

(by the way I don't think the BBC is biased one way or another. Just putting a little counter balance to the endless accusations of left wing bias from Auntie. Accusations that of course you're happy to let pass without question... Just Googled right wing bbc bias and the RT article was first up. There's loads of similar, just as there are loads of articles that inform IBS, Grist and Fire. I think the point being that extremists on both the left and right hold the vote that the BBC are biased against them, and endlessly drone on about it...)